Talk:Baruch College
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Universities, an attempt to standardise coverage of universities and colleges. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
There are no ranking citations??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.160.130.46 (talk) 21:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Its a little better than it was yesterday. We still need to clean it up.
Contents |
[edit] Neutrality
This seems to read like promo material. The recognition of rankings from U.S. News and others becomes insipid. Some needs to take the peppiness of this down a notch or two...
Jarfingle 06:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DO NOT DELETE/REVERSE THIS THIS PAGE WITHOUT DISCUSSION
This version seems better than previous version
[edit] Disagree!
Baruch is underrated. The Largest Business School in America can't have such a small niche on wiki Other Colleges have posted their Rankings..Baruch should be given an equal chance to Please try to edit the information posted rather than remove it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.80.158.200 (talk) 10:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC).
I am not here to agree or disagree on Baruch's rankings. However, just because the b-school is the largest (in terms of student body?) doesn't necessarily make it outstanding. It may mean that Baruch has a very high acceptance rate, is much cheaper than other area schools, and is easier (in terms) of curriculum. I'm not saying it is, I'm just trying to show that larger doesn't mean much. Obviously, it's a CUNY school, so I would expect it to be considerably cheaper than Fordham, Columbia, NYU and Pace. How about looking at average GMAT scores, starting salary for recent grads, prominent faculty, schools facilities, recruiting on campus, etc... Additionally, can the rankings be verified? Just a thought. --24.189.35.249 (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I agree that Baruch is underrated=
I heard its a great business college for the bucks. This college should get same chance as other colleges.
[edit] Large scale reversion
The large scale reversion was needed, as the copyright problems with this article were very severe. The first copyright violation was this September 2005 edit, which took material from About the Zicklin School of Business, some of which was still there in the version I dealt with. Andjam 12:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
March 12, 2007 vandalism to the Wikipedia Polynomial article: Listing "yeskl;jlfjdsljhflkahshfiwohfdkls;FHODS" under the SEE ALSO section! Larry R. Holmgren 01:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] It was ripped...
"Our College..."
College pages need an overall policy. I imagine most college wiki articles have this type of promo copy in them. This copy is not helpful to the reader. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.89.71.11 (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Baruch.png
Image:Baruch.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Baruchbearcats.jpg
Image:Baruchbearcats.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Baruchhead.jpg
Image:Baruchhead.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non Neutral POV Removal
I removed the statement "Many of the students who attend Baruch College today are amazing scholars with an unbelievably high gpa. These students simply want to pursue a business degree at the best public business school in nyc!" This statement is non neutral POV. Burnsie510 (talk) 01:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
