Talk:Bartimaeus Trilogy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Cleaned up the formatting of the article a bit. Also added more information on individual books in the series siddharth 10:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Biased
This entire section about the characters is completely biased. Whoever wrote this just wrote the whole thing in their POV.
I agree. Especially about Bartimaeus being a comic relief. Being sarcastic and witty doesn't make you a comic relief.
I also agree, luckily I have changed the bit about comic relief to explicate a much better description of his footnotes rather than comic relief if you ask me.
- He's not a comic relief at all. Though his comments can be really funny, his parts are just as serious as Nathaniel's or Kitty's. Starla Dear 02:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe we could say he provides comic relief. Jamhaw 19:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)jamhaw
[edit] Incorrect
[edit] Real History
Notice that the English civil war had happened and later wizards seized power also the Holy Roman Emipire never fell making me think that someone in the empire enlisted demons during the thirty years war and also technology appears not to have advanced as far ironclads are the best ships they have but the wisards have got jets.
[edit] OMFG!!!
So many of the characters listed are unimportant, only main and major antagonists and protagonists are to be shown not character who existed for 3 chapters!!! I'm deleting the unneeded ones, if you would like to argue, visit my talk page. Therequiembellishere 05:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] movie
i just saw in orkut that some people were ranting on the trilogy being made into a movie is there any truth in this
[edit] Another Book?
Does anyone know if there is going to be another book because I have tried to find anything about it but there isn't anything about it. Trust me, the only thing more annoying then finding out that there isn't going to be another book is not knowing anything at all so please tell me if you know anything
OmNiFiSh 02:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
The Bartimaeus Trilogy is a, um, Trilogy ie. 3 books. There's been 3 books. It's over.
[edit] Varoq is NOT a major Character
Who's bright idea was it to list Varoq as a main character, along with Bartimaeus, Nathaniel and Kitty? This is plainly nonsense, so I'm getting rid of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.0.15 (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Amuletsamarkand.jpg
Image:Amuletsamarkand.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Golemseye.jpg
Image:Golemseye.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
