From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to The Simpsons. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also our guide to sources. |
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
Mid |
This article is on a subject of mid-importance within The Simpsons. |
Here are some tasks you can do: |
edit |
- Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
- Copyedit:
- Merge: D'oh! → Homer Simpson (Discuss first)
- Cleanup: Bouvier family, Politics in The Simpsons, Springfield's state, The Simpsons Road Rage, Otto Mann, Martin Prince, Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
- Shorten plot synopsis: Future-Drama, A Star Is Torn, All About Lisa, Mona Leaves-a, Smoke on the Daughter, Large Marge
- Reference: Bart Simpson, Bongo Comics, Cheese-eating surrender monkeys, Comic Book Guy, Homer's Odyssey, Itchy & Scratchy in Miniature Golf Madness, Joshua Sternin, Lona Williams, Montgomery Burns, Night of the Living Treehouse of Horror, Rainier Wolfcastle, List of Springfield Elementary School students, Steve O'Donnell, Springfield's state, The Heartbroke Kid, The Itchy and Scratchy Game, Weekend at Burnsie's, World of Springfield
- Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Josh Weinstein, Bill Oakley, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon
- Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, Bart's House of Weirdness, Big Bad Book of Bart Simpson, J. Stewart Burns, Itchy & Scratchy in Miniature Golf Madness, Simpsons Classics, The Simpsons: Bart vs. the World, The Simpsons Bowling, Virtual Bart More...
|
|
|
This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. |
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] GA review
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Reference 6 was sorted out just after I'd written this review - the article now fully meets the criteria. Congratulations! --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 14:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Gran2 14:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 19:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
just thought it should be pointed out. --Jdb00 (talk) 14:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)