Talk:Baroque (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
I do not understand the request to have no heading paragraph and body and reduce this page to a stub. Articles on Wikipedia should have an opening summary, then a detailed body. The three points of contention today: 1. Another editor objects to calling the body "Biography" or "Band History" (perhaps just History as here might be ok. 2. The other question is weather the terms visual kei or oshare kei should be used to describe the band, as it only applies to their indies period. However, I have two sources (in japanese) that describe them this way. The term Oshare Kei was coined to describe this band, and had an influence on many bands that followed, the term is still in use. (English sources that report this are fan sites and can't be used). 3. Should the article be reducded to a stub (as everything is sourced) or stay fleshed out as an article, which is preferable? I argue that a fleshed out, sourced article, is the goal. Denaar 12:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
