Talk:Barnabas Fund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Barnabas Fund article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Anonymous edits

The article has been edited several times by unregistered users. If you have something to contribute to this page, please register as a user and discuss the changes here in the talk page. Otherwise, such edits will be reverted. DFH 19:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with having edits by unregistered users; this is permissible and even encouraged by Wikipedia policy. If you want to proselytize, do it elsewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.34.208 (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 'islamaphobic'?

I would like to request patience by the original author/authors for my editing (deleting) of the word 'islamaphobic' in the passage about the Barnabas Fund's published works regarding Islam and western society. To call them islamaphobic, or indeed truthful is surely, in the context of this website, a matter of opinion and should therefore be left to the readers of those books to make up their own minds. I did toy with the phrase '..some have interpreted them as islamaphobic' but one might as well (in order to be impartial - which I assume an encyclopedia should strive to be) then say ..'and others have interpreted as true'. You would then have to state opinions on both sides concerning practically everything in every article. The preceding words.. 'At the same time, Barnabas Fund officials are quite opposed to the trend of Christian conversions to other religions in Western countries..' has validity because as an organisation which believes that the Gospels and the messages therein are true they are bound (logically) to be opposed to conversion to other religions. This makes the statement more than just opinion unlike the 'islamaphodic' reference which follows.

In gratitude for your understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dullitch (talk • contribs) 12:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Dullitch (talk) 12:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)