Talk:Barker's Beauties

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Television Game Shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to game shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Barker vs. classic "Beauties"

I don't know if this appropriate for this article, but should we add statements (albeit brief) about the strife that exists between Bob Barker and the "classic Beauties" (Janice, Holly, Kathleen and Dian)? I thought of this after reading the article about Bob Barker in the print edition of the May 14, 2007 USA Today (this was a sidebar to the main article about Barker's long TV career). The reporter attempted to ask him about where he stands with the "classic Beauties;" Bob firmly would not talk about the subject, except to say "They're disgusting." The feud he has with the "classic Beauties" has been well documented, and credible news sources are easy to find (although I'm sure each model's page also has sourced statements about their individual falling outs with Barker). The article, BTW, also went on to note Barker's glowing review of the current group of Beauties. Sorry if I sound long-winded, but any comments are appreciated. [[Briguy52748 20:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)]] (BTW — Only the main article about Barker's career is posted on USA Today's online site; the sidebar with the remarks about the classic Beauties appears to be in the print edition only).

Well, I have heard no response, so I guess it may be time to be bold and add it. And BTW, I did see where the "critical" remarks for the classic beauties and the praise for the current ones is included with the online USA Today article. [[Briguy52748 18:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)]]

[edit] Model list

I would like to suggest that the list be ordered (in this order of criteria):

  1. chronologically by earliest debut
  2. chronologically by eraliest departure
  3. alphabetically by surname (for any who may have worked the exact same period)

TheHYPO (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)