User talk:Bannostookaylo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Artemis Fowl (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Artemis Fowl (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Artemis Fowl (film). Carados (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Artemis Fowl

Well, for one, it isn't speedy delete, so you have about 5 days to fix it up. The main problem is the lack of sources, as you stated. One of those things most people don't look at wikipedia is the fact that most of everything must be sourced. In addition, most films don't meet the notability guidelines until they are into production. Check out WP:MOVIE for more information. Best of luck, -Carados (talk) 06:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)