Talk:Bankruptcy in Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

⚖
Law Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale.
Canada Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Canadian law
This article is part of the Canadian law WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

[edit] TITLES

YOU DO NOT NEED TO WRITE THE TITLES IN CAPITALS! talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

I am not versed in Canadian law but I can give some pointers as this article is on the WikiProject:Law page.

  • The article has no head. The overview pahaps could be moved to the head?
  • More links would be nice. More Blue! There are none, could be well over 100. Consumer, Bankrupcy (general), federal and provincial in the first line all have articles on wikipedia.
  • (Unless this is different in Canada) Use legal citation. referencing using [1]

Overall the article is great. This criticism is intended to be helpful :-) Bamkin 15:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

  1. ^ Footnotes

[edit] Chapter References in Parentheses

I find a good deal of this article to be unclear. In the first place I do not know what the chapter references listed after many bulleted points are referring to. There are several instances of either missing words or misplaced commas. As well, the language used is not altogether approachable to someone not well versed in Canadian law. The quality ratings above are pretty accurate; a good start, but needs some work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.1.143.100 (talk) 12:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)