Talk:Bangladeshi national cricket captains

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former featured list Bangladeshi national cricket captains is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Bangladeshi national cricket captains is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Flag Bangladeshi national cricket captains is part of WikiProject Bangladesh, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bangladesh and Bangladesh-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not subsitute this template.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Collaborations: Sundarbans & Cox's Bazar

Why is this a FL? There are too many red links. DaGizza Chat (c) 23:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Our standards were a bit lower all of 6 months ago. But there are really not all that many pages to creat to turn those red links blue. There is always WP:FLRC. -- ALoan (Talk)

[edit] Here is the old Featured List Removal Candidates page

Bangladeshi national cricket captains===

Still a Featured list

Promoted ages ago. This is not a featured list for these reasons: Of the links, one third are red, which is too many; at least one section with prose needs a copyedit; what is included in the list implies the non-existence of other possible teams; it appears not to have been updated. Nominate for demotion. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Remove, was done for Sri Lanka and India. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Still think it should be removed if it is not updated. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Keep now updated - thanks Sam Vimes. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Remove per all reasons stated above. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 12:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Perhaps someone has been working on the red-link because I only count 4 out of 24 captains in red - much less than the claimed one-third and a small number in itself. Reason 3 and 4 may be valid, though. Rmhermen 04:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
I just checked and some of the missing articles were created last week as stubs. Thanks for bringing this up. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 18:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral now. Some links have been redded and a copyedit was done, although one section still needs updating and there are no explicit answers to point 3. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 18:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. This is an interesting situation. Should a list be demoted if it hasn't been updated? I'm inclined to say yes it should. However, given that the list is apparently being worked on, I say we give this nomination one more week. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 17:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Updated now. Sam Vimes 16:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)