Talk:Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I know this isn't a productive comment, but this seriously is the worst movie I have ever seen. Just read over the comments at IMDB. Onishenko 02:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Productive or not, you're absolutely right. It has to be the worst film of the new millenium (2001-2006 so far) that i've ever seen. --Stevekl 20:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
THIS MOVIE WAS NOT BAD!!!! I wouldnt say that its the best movie ever but i can name 50 more movies worst than this one... besides Lucy Liu looked gorgeous in this movie.--Oneshyguy46
The movie might be bad, but can someone put a summary of this up? I personally didn't mind it THAT much. 125.228.194.250 11:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Trying to depict coldness cinematically requires a heart, otherwise it just gets detached and uninteresting. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 12:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Math?
"...worst reviewed movie ever at 1.5831%, receiving positive ratings from zero out of 102 reviews."
- I'll admit, I'm not great at math, but how does 0/102 = 1.5831%? I coulda sworn that 0 out of anything still means 0 in the end. Can anyone explain this? Ghostalker (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Each reviewer gives the movie a score from 0-10. 0 of the reviews were positive, but the average of the 0-10 scare was 0.015831, as some of the reviewers gave 1/10 or higher (but less than 5/10) ratings. This is not really explained well in the article 207.54.56.115 (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Stub-Class Canadian cinema articles | Unknown-importance Canadian cinema articles | Canadian cinema task force articles | Stub-Class Southeast Asian cinema articles | Unknown-importance Southeast Asian cinema articles | Southeast Asian cinema task force articles | Stub-Class film articles | Unknown-importance film articles