Talk:Balance (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.
Maintenance A plot summary needs to be added to this film article, or the current one needs to be expanded.
Maintenance Please add more information about the cast and the crew, discussing the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, and giving insights into the casting and staffing where possible. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines for more advice.

In the interest of accuracy, Balance is not a cartoon, it is stop-motion animation. I will add this article to the Balance disambiguation page, but someone trying to find it without the disambiguation page is unlikely to find it since the film is not a cartoon. (Film) or (Short) would be a better differential adjective. Can we change this? Canonblack 17:35, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

A better title would be Balance (animation). I'll move it there. You can change the links if you like. Balance (cartoon) will remain as a redirect. --KJBracey 07:25, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

In case that at a later date, a criticism-section will be added, i would suggest the following two points: 1. The suggested "judgement" of the movie, is itself out of balance. It does, as so many others, portrait "altruism" as good and "egoism" as bad. It fails to show that altruism disrupts the balance as well, and that the only possible win-situation, would be "mutualism". 2. One could argue that if the box represents resources, then the fact that it is one single item, which cannot positionally be distributed leads to a skewed perception of reality. --82.141.53.223 16:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)