User:Bakasuprman/Archive17
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Sir, why are you removing texts critical of Vishwa Hindu Parishad
Honourable sir, I was going through the articles on Indian Right wing organisations and see that you most respectful Sir, have edited the Vishva Hindu Parishad article..Sir, As I can see you have edited the article in a way , that makes it imbalanced.Sir, as you can see from the example below:
You have removed the following:
The demolition of the mosque in 1992 led to violence. Hindutva mobs attacked Muslim neighborhoods and took to rioting in various parts of the country often aided by police action [1]. Over 900 people were killed across the country in VHP and Bajrang Dal (its youth wing) violence and police action.
and Sir, you have changed it to read
The demolition of the mosque in 1992 led to violence. Muslim mobs took to rioting in various parts of the country leading to communal violence and resultant police action [2]. Over 900 people were killed across the country in riots and police action.
which I most humbly believe,Sir, is the exact opposite of what it was before.Now, Sir, I have great value for your edits , as I see you someone very strong but Sir, I don't understand why you would need to write something exactly opposite without discussing and why anyone of your exalted status would elaborate such a text with a reference from Hindu Vivek Kendra] which itself could be taken as a partisan organisation.While dear sir, there is ample online evidence like the Book - Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics, 1925 to 1990's which states the mechanism by which the Shiv Sena and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad - Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh - BJP combine would organise Maha Artis on Bombay's Roads attended by thousands of Hindus followed by attacks on Muslim properties...
also Sir, let us take another look on this from Feminist Review In the Bombay Riots of January 1993 when several thousand Muslims, including women and children were killed,Muslim women gangraped and between 2000 and 4000 Muslim homes and shops burnt down, the role of Hindu women's neighbourhood organisations became brutally clear.Women from the ultra-right wing fascist organisation, the Shiva Sena, came and sat down in the streets to prevent fire trucks from reaching Muslim neighbourhoods.when a Shiv Sena leader was arrested for carrying carloads of weapons during curfew hours, women from the organisation came and lay down on the streets to prevent the removal of arrested man.... ..So very lovely sir, I would like you to reconsider the changes that you made blaming the Muslims for the Bombay riots..You can see many other newspapers like The Tribune that said that ..The commission, in its 800-page report tabled in the state legislature, said there was no doubt that the Shiv Sena and Shiv Sainiks took lead in organising attacks on Muslims and their properties under the guidance of several party leaders Terminador 21:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
DYK
 |
Did you know? was updated. On 3 June 2007, a fact from the article Trivikrama Mahadeva, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Sean William @ 03:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Repeated attempts to introduce ambiguity into Right Wing Hindu Party Bharatiya Janata Party page
Hi Bakaman,may I remind you , going by all the issues that I can see in your edit history to abstain from introducing ambiguity into Hindu Xenophobic organisation's pages to show them into softer aspects.Please see the two edits you did , [The first one] twists the language into making the issue incomprehensible for anyone new to recent Indian politics.Please abstain Mcleodganj 17:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Your list of "names"...
... is really funny. And it says - something, about the nature of this project. Not sure what yet, but something... Yours, Smee 04:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC).
DYK
|
On June 5, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ghazi Muhammad, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks again Baka. Keep it up! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
On June 25, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article O. Rajagopal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Keep cracking with the DYKs...Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Bakaman Well Done
I know it's hard to digest the truth, inspite of verifiable links you RV the contents of Hindutva! Everyline of this article is biased and OR. I know if I write a single line without verifiable link, you have powers to block my ID forever and you will not spare me for a second, I can see that you have great knowledge and great contributor but it does not matter, The identity of gentleman is not measured with his knowledge but his manners. I don't that you even respect the rules of wikepedia. Since I abide the rules of wikepedia, I am not deleting anyline from Hindutva article as I respect other auhtor too have right to include verifiable contents.
With Love John Paul 12:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Please
if possible please change the potrait of Atalji. I think there should be compatibly good looking and positive-impression pics available....
Thanks Jon Ascton
List of Hindu mathematicians
List of Hindu mathematicians has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this list might not be appropriate for Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:List guideline for relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Thích Quảng Đức
During the Chef Goes Nanners episode of southpark, Chef holds up a picture of thich in front of him (on which the camera zooms in on). So this material does belong on the page. I was not trying to present it as triva since it was a paragraph and not a series of bullet-pointed sentences. I have left a comment for the user, who deleted it, on Talk:Thích Quảng Đức. I hope you will join in on the discussion. (Ghostexorcist 20:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC))
Regarding your newest name
[1] I think he was calling himself an American, not you. And how is that negative in any way? I ask that because your list only contains the insulting names you have been given and not any of the commendable ones. GizzaChat © 10:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know were you were born :) I only know that you ethinically originate from India and currently live in the States. I don't know whether you moved or were born in America (I'm guessing America though). I also don't quite understand your neutrality in danger elsewhere comment but anyway, whatever. Have a nice day, GizzaChat © 06:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Goa Inquisition.jpg
 |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Goa Inquisition.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar 15:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Swami Yogananda Giri
This article is very confusing. It is very easy to mistake the person described in it with Paramahansa Yogananda. I think you should clarify it. Best regards. Kkrystian 08:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Re:
Thanks for informing be about M. Chidananda Murthy. I'll try to expand that article in coming days.Gnanapiti 07:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
BJP Treat of de-reorganize
Hi Bakaman, I don’t want to conflict with you as you are the powerful man. Since you don’t want to have separate section for “Treat of de-reorganize”, I agree with you hence I created separate section to include the contents of anti Muslim VCD, but I wonder why did supporter of BJP changed their mind suddenly to dilute this major issue into a invisible little para! Few days ago this issue was like BJP national prestige. Anyhow we will leave it them and don’t get into details. With love to Bakaman, John Paul 10:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Reinserted Threat of Derecognition
Dear beloved sir, Good Morning..I understand that you are sir a very prowerful person on Wikipedia and your highness are respected for valuable contributions on many domains specially regarding providing Hindus great respect.Sir, I am sorry but I have included a very detailed section on the threat to derecognise the Bharatiya Janata Party.This event is very significant in my humble understanding sir and there are some more too who think otherwise to you sir.You are genius sir...I respect you sir very strongly.I know sir, seeing your edit history sir, that you are undergoing some kind of issues bcoz of HKelkar, Sir.I wish you good luck Terminador 17:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Little context in Nobin
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nobin, by Anwar saadat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nobin is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nobin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Nobin itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
Your disruptive editing and revert warring have earned you a block. Have a nice day. Circeus 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is one of the more inappropriate block notifications I've seen.Proabivouac 02:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Block
For edit warring, as described at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#edit-warring_duo, I'm going to block you for a week. Take a break, calm down, and try to be more productive when you return. Adam Cuerden talk 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Baka, thanks for your note of support at my RfA. Shyamal 04:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Oak
I agree with your statement on the talk page that he isn't notable. Are you thinking of filing an AFD? Let me know if you are. Thanks GizzaChat © 12:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've never insulted you, I have criticised you of course. I don't mind never talking with you again but the problem is that our of areas of editing overlap. The best I can do is unwatch pages that you edit frequently where I don't really have an interest in. Gee, it is one thing to lie and another to do it emotionally. It is a shame you guys view everything in terms of sides. That's how this mess started. But I'll accept your request to try to stop talking with you ever again. Unless you really want to reply to this message, it is advisable that you and your friends don't because continuing the discussion is just going to hurt us more and more. Let the unwatching begin! (firstly your talk page :p) GizzaChat © 07:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Invite
 |
Please accept this invite to join the Bangladesh History Workgroup, a subproject dedicated to improving Bangladesh history related articles. To join, simply click here and add your name to the bottom of the list! Aditya Kabir 14:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC) |
FAC
please support into Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Language_movement as the article about Language movement is in the FAC. And also give some help with the article if you can. Tarif from Bangladesh 07:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
Hi Bakasuprman bhayia, a new project has just started, Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities. Feel free to participate there.Thank you--NAHID 06:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
A million thanks(thank you, thank you...) for your support. Hopefully we will make it. I'll get you the update. Tarif from Bangladesh 20:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Category deletion
Hi Bakasuprman. You recently nominated several categories (Cat:Canadians of Indian descent, etc) for speedy deletion, with reasons that might be good reason to delete, but don't make deletion obviously the right thing to do, and definitely aren't speedy deletion criteria. If any of the categories were empty before you removed the articles, then you could nominate them for deletion under criterion C1, but I suggest you nominate the others for deletion at Categories for Deletion, so that some other views an be obtained before they are deleted. JPD (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Nitin Gadkari
Can you please help take it to DYK.Shyamsunder 11:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Manu Smriti
I would like to raise the bar on sourcing for this article, which is a popular soapbox. Would you help by giving the article a copyedit and challenging anything that looks like a weak source, POV, or other problematic content? The article keeps popping up as an issue on other articles, so I think that improving quality on it will have a ripple effect elsewhere. Buddhipriya 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply
Thanks for making Category:Alumni_by_university_in_Bangladesh.It's really helpful.Best--NAHID 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
barnstar
 |
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| We dont really know each other but I think you deserve this for you contributions to India and Hindism related articles.-Chowk 21:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
poverty in Pakistan
Please keep a watch on that article.A troll (presumably Pakistani) is trying to remove sourced information.Thanks.-Chowk 23:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Gone to review
I have put myself for an editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Aditya Kabir. Check. Aditya Kabir 05:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for your support and comments at my RfA | |
| Hi Bakasuprman, It still amazes me that otherwise "anonymous" editors take the time to place !votes and comments on RfAs. Whilst I would have normally thanked you at the time of you leaving your message, the importance of my not appearing to be canvassing prevented me from so doing. Now that everything has progressed successfully I can finally thank you. I intend to uphold a style of good adminship and will welcome your further comments at any time in the future, even if they are in the form of admonishment. I will be happy to help as an admin wherever and whenever I can --VS talk 23:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
Canadian by X descent cats
Hi Baka, I noticed that the closing admin. merged the nominated categories, except two for which he/she didn't understand the reason you had (properly) listed two merge/redistribution options. Please let me know if you renominate these remaining cats. for deletion, so that I can add my support. I usually don't watchlist AFD/CFD pages and will miss !voting otherwise :-) Thanks. Abecedare 23:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Phony 3RR report
Hello Baka.
While although I realize that last 3RR report is obviously wrong (4 reverts across THREE days?!?), it still doesn't look good for you to add a 'result' to it. Even though it's a reeeally easy call, you should still leave it for an admin to make that call. Bladestorm 00:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Really? I'm sorry. I really did try to verify it before saying anything. I guess I screwed up. Sorry about that. Bladestorm 00:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Aiyar
That was an interesting observation, I hadn't realized the ambiguity in the transliteration. The source might have had a diactric mark (a dot) over the A - make it Aayar (Tamil: ஆயர்) phonetically. I will double check the source, but in any case, it probably is better to deviate from the source's spelling in this case, to clear the confusion. Thanks for the good catch :) Lotlil 22:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Request to add updates on WP:HINDU
(I'm sending this message to you because you often create Hinduism-related pages). On the new-look WikiProject Hinduism page, there is a "Recently updated articles" section where updates and creations related to Hinduism can be listed which will bring its attention to other Hinduism editors. I encourage using it as an effective and efficient notification tool. Thank you GizzaDiscuss © 22:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On July 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adivasi Cobra Force, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Well done Baka.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
How to deal with seperatist user
On Talk:Sino-Indian War, an IP user (check the history) has been going on about India's Rape of Goa and keeps posting links to Goan seperatist websites. He also goes on about Indian bullying of Sikkim and Bhutan and his words, despite being irrelevant, remain on the talk page, sending viewers of the talk page to Free Goa websites. How does one deal with this? Traing 02:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Goa Inquistion
Thank you for pointing that out. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Baka, I've said all along that Priolkar is a good source; the problem is that the article doesn't accurately reflect what he says. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Heads up
I started a thread about Anwar Sadaat & you at WP:ANI:
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Anwar_Sadaat_and_User:Bakasuprman.2C_edit_warring_again. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
I've blocked you for 48 hours. Edit-warring like that, across so many articles - just no. Wikipedia works by discussion and consensus, not fighting. Thank you. Discuss, don't revert - or, at least, don't revert beyond these limits. Moreschi Talk 19:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have undone this unilateral blocking for no violations of policy. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Baka. Please calm down. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 15:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
