Talk:Bahá'u'lláh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bahá'í Faith This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahá'í Faith, a coordinated attempt to increase the quality and quantity of information about the Bahá'í Faith on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
 WikiProject Religion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B on the Project's quality scale. See comments
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.

[edit] Photo opinions subpage

A sub-page Talk:Bahá'u'lláh/Photo has been added to post opinions regarding the photo issue

[edit] Archives

  1. /Archive 1 Orthodox Bahais, some factual (in)accuracies, Baha'ullah's wives and the picture
  2. /Archive 2 contains more debate about the picture and the wives
  3. /Archive 3 about Mirza Yahya and a lot more about the picture
  4. /Archive 4 Has not been parcelled out to the other archives yet. Cunado19 02:51, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
  5. /Archive 5 Has not been parcelled out to the other archives yet. Cunado19 17:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
  6. /Archive 6 06:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

The Archives have been reorganised as follows to make it easier to follow the discussion threads:

The original Archives remain unchanged for the time being. --Occamy 22:19, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)