User talk:BadMojoDE
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, BadMojoDE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Goldensun 23:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Warning Against Threatening Other Editors
Please do not further threaten other Wikipedia editors the way you did on the Talk Page for the article on pro-pedophile activism. This is unacceptable, goes against Wikipedia policy, and will not be tolerated. Your actions will shortly be reported to an administrator, and repetition of such commentary may lead to a block of your editing privileges. ~ Homologeo 04:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- The report of your actions to the Incidents Section of the Administrators' Noticeboard can be found here: [1]. ~ Homologeo 04:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
-
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.Per WP:NLT, you have been blocked per your legal threat at Talk:Pro-pedophile activism [2]. I will unblock you if you rescind your threat. If there is something else that is concerning you, you should go contact the Wikipedia office, by email. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
As of 10:45 on October 28, 2007, I rescind my legal threat towards any and all Wikipedia editors. I did not wish to cause trouble; however, I personally do not condone the talk page of that article. I will stay away from it. I hereby request that my editing privileges are completely restored. You may discuss this further with my on my talk page. BadMojoDE 02:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that though. Nothing personal you understand? Also, I don't know if you pay anything to the admin noticeboards but you'd see that there are some things going on around here with that stuff (by Arbcom so out of my league) which I hope alleviates your concerns a little. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- The only way to change this and other articles is to get involved and I would argue it is people's not getting involved that has allowed the present problem to arise, so please feel free to get involved if you wish but staying within our policies, SqueakBox 17:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Our policies
There is no wikipedia policy against contacting authorities, indeed the foundation would in certain cases advise people being harassed etc to contact authorities. What is strictly against policies is to threaten to do so or to say one has done so. Thanks, SqueakBox 02:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pro-pedophile activism
I'm sorry but the article is a legitimate topic. Deletion has been discussed not just once, but a second time just recently. I would remind you to see WP:CENSOR. Now, if the talk page seems to be veering off discussion of the language in the article (violating WP:TALK), then there is a concern.
I will just have to say that edits like this ("check yourself into rehab") are not civil at all. Please refrain from commenting on the motivations of other users; it is just distracting and frankly, weakens your point. It is entirely possible here to create neutral articles (like the work at Holocaust denial) that people violently disagree with with. I readily work all the time on articles I politically disagree with; it helps gives you some intellectual strength. I would suggest you list the article for deletion if you still think it should be deleted (but make sure you have a better reason than "It scares me" or "it may be illegal" or you'll lose pretty badly) or better yet, find someone else entirely to work on. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)