Talk:Backhousia citriodora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Backhousia citriodora is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
Backhousia citriodora is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Capitalization

I'd like to move this page to lemon myrtle. The capitalization seems to be a marketing gimmick. - mako 09:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

hon, everything is capitalized on wikipedia. even ebay. Joeyramoney 02:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment completed for Backhousia citriodora


As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: just reaches B - quite good referencing, seems quite complete, good image

However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.

ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)