Azimullah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Azimullah
Born: 1982 (age 25–26)
North Waziristan, Pakistan
Detained at: Guantanamo
ID number: 1050
Conviction(s): no charge, held in extrajudicial detention

Azimullah is a citizen of Afghanistan, held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[1] His Guantanamo Internee Security Number is 1050. American intelligence analysts estimate he was born in 1982, in North Waziristan, Pakistan.

Contents

[edit] Identity

Azimullah's name was not spelled consistently by the US Department of Defense:

  • His name was spelled as LNU, Azimullah on the Summary of Evidence memo prepared for his Combatant Status Review Tribunal, and on the Summary of Evidence memo prepared for his first annual Administrative Review Board hearings.[2][3]
  • His name was spelled as Azimullah (Last Name Unknown) on the Summary of Evidence memo prepared for his second annual Administrative Review Board hearings.[4]
  • His name was spelled as Azimullah on seven official list of captives' names the DoD published.[1][5][6][7][8][9][10]

[edit] Summary

Azimullah was one of more than half a dozen captives at Guantanamo who were transferred to Guantanamo because they were under suspicion for participating in rocket attacks on Firebase Salerno.

Azimullah, and several companions were students at a Madrassa in Khowst.[11] One of his fellow students, Mahbub Rahman, said he had been assaulted by the drug addict who killed his older brother several years before. He said he had shot his assailant in the leg, with his assailant's gun, and then run away. He had sought help from his school chums, Azimullah, while fleeing the scene in panic. They didn't present any resistance to the local militia, when they were captured.

[edit] Combatant Status Review Tribunal

Combatant Status Review Tribunals were held in a 3 x 6 meter trailer. The captive sat with his hands cuffed and feet shackled to a bolt in the floor. Three chairs were reserved for members of the press, but only 37 of the 574 Tribunals were observed.
Combatant Status Review Tribunals were held in a 3 x 6 meter trailer. The captive sat with his hands cuffed and feet shackled to a bolt in the floor.[12] Three chairs were reserved for members of the press, but only 37 of the 574 Tribunals were observed.[13]

Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the Geneva Conventions to captives from the war on terror. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct competent tribunals to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of prisoner of war status.

Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were lawful combatants -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an enemy combatant.

[edit] Summary of Evidence memo

A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Azimullah's Combatant Status Review Tribunal, on 1 November 2004.[2] The memo listed the following allegations against him:

a. The detainee is associated with forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.
  1. The detainee attended the Shinkay and Zaku Khel madrassas in Afghanistan.
  2. The detainee was a student at the madrassa during the Taliban rule.
  3. The detainee acted as a guide to a group of individuals attacking the Salerno Fire Base.
  4. The detainee acted as the guide for a group that had weapons, surveillance equipment (camera and binoculars) and radios.
  5. The detainee met with an Arab man and an Afghan man who gave him money prior to the attack on the firebase.
  6. The detainee was arrested for aiding personnel in operations against the Salerno Fire Base.
  7. The detainee was captured after the group that he was traveling with were engaged in a gunfight with Afghan Militia Force [sic] (AMF).

[edit] Transcript

Azimullah chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.[14] On March 3, 2006, in response to a court order from Jed Rakoff the Department of Defense published an eight page summarized transcript from his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.[15]

[edit] Witness requests denied

Azimullah requested the testimony of others from his madrassa. Azimullah's Tribunal's President told Azimullah:

"I also understand that you requested a witness, essentially anyone from your Madrassa. And I understand that basically you requested that they could testify to your good character. Essentially, character is not relevant to the Enemy Combatant issue and that request is denied."

[edit] Response to the allegations

  • Azimullah confirmed that he attended the Skikay and Zaku Khel madrassas.
  • Azimullah disputed that he was a student in these madrassas during the Taliban's
  • In response to the allegation that he acted as a guide to fighters attacking Fire Base Salerno Azimullah responded that he did not know this kind of man, and had nothing to do with the attack.
  • Azimullah denied that there were any cameras, radios or photo equipment with him or his companions when they were captured.
  • Azimullah denied being paid money in return for playing a role in the attack.
  • In response to the allegation that he was arrested due to his role in the attack he repeated that he knew nothing at all about the attack.

[edit] Response to Tribunal questions

  • In response to a question from his Personal Representative Azimullah clarified that he had not begun to attend either of the madrassas listed in the allegations, during the Taliban's rule. He had studied in his own village when Afghanistan was under Taliban rule.
  • Azimullah testified that his home was in the village of Sakafel, in Khost Province.
  • Azimullah was studying at the madrassa in Sakafel, from his villages' own Mala [sic] when the Taliban took power. He said he was "very little" when the Taliban took power.
  • Azimullah denied ever receiving any military training.
  • Azimullah said he stilled lived at home when he was captured. The Madrassa was within walking distance.
  • Azimullah said he shared his home with his father, brothers and nephews.
  • Azimullah said he farmed his families land with the other members of his family, growing corn, vegetables and wheat.
  • When asked if he was arrested before, or after, September 11, 2001 Azimullah said he did not recognize the date September 11. His recollection was that he was arrested during summertime.
  • Azimullah testified that he and his friend were walking when they were captured. They had no idea why they were captured. But, when they got back to base they were told they were captured because they had attacked the Afghan troops.
  • Azimullah testified he was captured with Salim.
  • Azimullah denied that he was taught jihad in the madrassas. His studies were confined to the Koran and other religious books.
  • Azimullah denied belonging to any charitable groups, or to ever working for al Qaida [sic] or the Taliban.
  • Azimullah testified that he had some formal education prior to attending the madrassa, that he had studied until third grade.
  • Azimullah testified he had never heard of Firebase Salerno, and that he didn't know the meaning of Salerno.
  • Azimullah testified he was unarmed when they were captured, but Salim was carrying a rifle.

[edit] Azimullah's testimony on behalf of Mahbub Rahman

Azimullah agreed to testify before Mahbub Rahman's Combatant Status Review Tribunal.[11] Azimullah and Rahman had studied at the same Madrassa. Rahman testified that he had fled Afghanistan for Pakistan when a drug addict who had killed his older brother had attacked him, and he had wounded him in self-defense. While he was return travel he sought out the help of his school chum Azimullah, inadvertently leading to Azimullah's capture and transportation to Guantanamo.

[edit] Administrative Review Board hearing

Hearing room where Guantanamo captive's annual Administrative Review Board hearings convened for captives whose Combatant Status Review Tribunal had already determined they were an "enemy combatant".
Hearing room where Guantanamo captive's annual Administrative Review Board hearings convened for captives whose Combatant Status Review Tribunal had already determined they were an "enemy combatant".[16]

Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board hearings.[17] The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".

They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.

[edit] First annual Administrative Review Board

A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Azimullah's first annual Administrative Review Board, on 26 April 2005.[3] The memo listed factors for and against his continued detention.

[edit] The following primary factors favor continued detention:

a. Commitment
  1. In March 2003, the detainee was involved in a foiled reconnaissance mission, coordinated by an al Qaida Southern Afghanistan Regional commander, who is also known as a facilitator.
  2. The detainee was a Madrassa student in Afghanistan for most of his life, including the timeframe during the Taliban rule. [sic]
  3. The detainee was at the Lakan Madrassa located in Lakan, Khowst Province, Afghanistan.
  4. Several anti-coalition members have been identified as having been students of the Laken/Dari Madrassa.
b. Training
The detainee's mother stated that he attended a training camp in Pakistan. Although, the detainee denied this, he did admit to loving his mother more than the men who trained him.
c. Connections/Associations
  1. The detainee was part of a group that included an individual from the Nazamia Madrassa and a known al Qaida member. Reportedly, the Nazamia Madrassa has been used by al Qaida, Taliban and Hizb-I Islam Gulbuddin (HIG) personnel for training. The detainee along with the other members of the group, were ordered by a known al Qaida facilitator to go to a burial ground, where Muslims go to pray near an operating base in Khost Province, Afghanistan, in order to film the base and surrounding areas.
  2. The detainee acted as a guide for a group that had weapons, surveillance equipment (cameras and binoculars) and radios.
  3. One of the individuals the detainee was with as part of the group, used a video camera to take pictures of checkpoints and the airport.
  4. Hizb-I Islami Gulbuddin [sic] has long established ties with Bin Ladin. [sic]
  5. The detainee was arrested for aiding personnel in operations against the Salerno Fire Base.
  6. The detainee was captured, after the group that he was traveling with was engaged in a gunfight with the Afghan Militia Force (AMF).
d. Other Relevant Data
  1. The detainee was deceptive and combative in his answers, while trying to claim that he was totally honest and cooperative.
  2. The detainee changed portions of his story, especially in relation to his capture.

[edit] The following primary factors favor release or transfer:

  • The detainee stated he has never had any military service and was never taught to use the Kalishnikov.
  • The detainee denies ever swearing Bia-at to any person or organization. He denies having ever been involved in any Jihad. In addition, the detainee stated he does not know of any Fatwah's [sic] that have ever been issued by any Eman [sic] (Religious Leader).

[edit] Transcript

Azimullah chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.[18] In the Spring of 2006, in response to a court order from Jed Rakoff the Department of Defense published a six page summarized transcript from this Administrative Review Board.[15]

[edit] Response to the factors

Although his transcript records that his Assisting Military Officer read out Azimullah's response to the factors, unusually his transcript does not record any of those responses.

[edit] Response to Board questions

  • Azimullah confirmed he was captured with a recent acquaintance named Salim.
  • In response to a question about his attitude towards the American people and the current government of Afghanistan Azimullah said he had no hard feelings.
  • Azimullah's hearing's Presiding Officer asked him several questions about the equipment carried by the fighters who attacked Firebase Salerno, and Azimullah repeated that he didn't see any equipment because he his only companion was Salim.
  • Azimullah confirmed that he was not carrying a weapon, when captured.
  • Azimullah answered that if released he would look for work, and return to farming his land.
  • Azimullah didn't remember how old he was when he first started studying, except that he was very young.
  • Azimullah said he had never had a job. The only work he had ever engaged in was working on his families farm.
  • Azimullah said he had attended just two madrassas, the one in his own village, when he was young, and another when he became older.

[edit] Second annual Administrative Review Board

A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Azimullah's second annual Administrative Review Board, on 5 March 2006.[4] The memo listed factors for and against his continued detention.

[edit] The following primary factors favor continued detention:

a. Commitment
  1. In late May 2003, the detainee was a part of a foiled reconnaissance mission coordinated by an al Qaida Southern Afghanistan Regional Commander who is also known as a facilitator.
  2. The detainee was a Madrassa student in Afghanistan for most of his life, including the timeframe during the Taliban rule.
  3. The detainee was at the Lakan Madrassa located in Lakan, Khowst Province, Afghanistan.
b. Connections/Associations
  1. The detainee acted as a guide for a group that had weapons, surveillance equipment (cameras and binoculars) and radios.
  2. One of the individuals the detainee was with as part of the group used a video camera to take pictures of checkpoints and the airport.
  3. The detainee was arrested for aiding personnel in operations against the Salerno Fire Base.
  4. The detainee was captured after the group that he was traveling with was engaged in a gunfight with the Afghan Militia Force.
c. Other Relevant Data
  1. The detainee was deceptive and combative in his answers, while trying to claim that he was being honest and cooperative.
  2. The detainee changed portions of his story, especially in relation to his capture.

[edit] The following primary factors favor release or transfer:

a.

The detainee stated he has never had any military service and was never taught to use the Kalishnikov [sic] .
b.

The detainee denies ever swearing Bia-at to any person or organization. He denies having ever been involved in any jihad. In addition, the detainee stated he does not know of any fatwas that have ever been issued by any Eman.

[edit] Release

Azimullah was released in September 2007.[19]

As of March 18, 2008 the Washington Post lists Azimullah as still in detention in Guantanamo.[20]

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b OARDEC (May 15, 2006). List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through May 15, 2006. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  2. ^ a b OARDEC (1 November 2004). Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- LNU, Azimullah pages 40-41. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2008-05-08.
  3. ^ a b OARDEC (26 April 2005). Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of pages 64-65. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2008-05-08.
  4. ^ a b OARDEC (5 March 2006). Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Azimullah (Last Name Unknown) page 46-47. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2008-05-05.
  5. ^ OARDEC (April 20, 2006). List of detainee who went through complete CSRT process. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  6. ^ OARDEC (July 17, 2007). Index for Combatant Status Review Board unclassified summaries of evidence. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  7. ^ OARDEC (September 4, 2007). Index for testimony. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  8. ^ OARDEC (August 9, 2007). Index to Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round One. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  9. ^ OARDEC (August 9, 2007). Index of Transcripts and Certain Documents from ARB Round One. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  10. ^ OARDEC (July 17, 2007). Index of Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round Two. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  11. ^ a b Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mahbub Rahman'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 93-108
  12. ^ Inside the Guantánamo Bay hearings: Barbarian "Justice" dispensed by KGB-style "military tribunals", Financial Times, December 11, 2004
  13. ^ Annual Administrative Review Boards for Enemy Combatants Held at Guantanamo Attributable to Senior Defense Officials. United States Department of Defense (March 6, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-09-22.
  14. ^ OARDEC (date redacted). Summarized Statement pages 31-38. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2008-05-08.
  15. ^ a b "US releases Guantanamo files", The Age, April 4, 2006. Retrieved on 2008-03-15. 
  16. ^ Spc Timothy Book. "Review process unprecedented", JTF-GTMO Public Affairs Office, Friday March 10, 2006, pp. pg 1. Retrieved on 2007-10-10. 
  17. ^ Army Sgt. Sarah Stannard. "OARDEC provides recommendations to Deputy Secretary of Defense", JTF Guantanamo Public Affairs, October 29, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-03-26. 
  18. ^ OARDEC (date redacted). Summary of Administrative Review Board Proceedings of ISN 1050 pages 189-194. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2008-05-08.
  19. ^ Andy Worthington. "Eight More Wrongly Imprisoned Men are Quietly Released: The Anonymous Victims of Guantánamo", =Counterpunch, October 5, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-10-06. 
  20. ^ "Names of the Detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba", Washington Post. Retrieved on 2008-03-18.