User talk:Ayoleftyz/Archive01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Dude leave it alone

Are you fucking retarded? I keep editing Kanye West's "Stronger" page it keeps getting changed it back. Timbaland re-created the beats meaning he is a fucking producer so I don't need a source...it's a damn fact. It's not "digital download" it's "Digital Download" because that's the name of something. Jesus what the fuck is up with you? Leave it the FUCK ALONE! Extremador —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremador (talk • contribs) 04:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


From Curtis talk page

Special thanks to Egeiz for reverting even after I started to format the "new track listing". The sources that Trimy67 gave were, a blog, a link to some "MySpot" from SOHH.com (which had nothing to do with Curtis), and a link to a page that does not want to open (you know, the whole "Page can't be displayed" thing). Furthermore, your sources did not have 50 Cent confirm them themselves, once again, even though this track listing might not be correct, it is all we have. Also, just because "Ayo Technology" is not on this album, it does not mean that any other track listing that does not include it is fake, he could have decided not to use it anymore (even if he confirmed it), use it on another album (Before I Self Destruct), or maybe it will end up on Timberlake's next album, who knows, but please don't assume that just because the Timberlake song is not listed here (or on any other track listing for that matter), then that must mean the track listing is fake. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 01:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
So yeah, I actually forgot to check the links... good thing you were there to revert. I'm getting a bit tired of this whole thing with fake track listings, it is the track listing by Interscope... Peace out. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 01:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


Sorry

Sorry man i was just reading the curtis album discussion, far out man chillll its only a page, you do not know everything and by the way i have seen the official curtis album tracklisting and all i can say is. You's are well off! Peace out

Funny how he thinks he has seen the official track listing, but on the talk page of the article he says that there is no official track listing. Then he gets so excited when some guy that forgot to sign his name told us what we all already knew, that it is only June, and that there is no track listing yet. Now he claims we are way off and that we should chill, even though he is the guy that started the whole edit war. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 23:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Nah last week had people using ma wikipedia account for bull****, however they did forget that writing a comment does leave your name. sorry all i posted that day was the good work for getting rid of fake tracklistings Peaceout!!!

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Curtis official cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Curtis official cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Lil' C

Lil' C has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this musician or group might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (music) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ray-L. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closenplay 09:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ray-L, you will be blocked from editing. Closenplay 11:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

It's that you keep removing the {{db-bio}} tag at the top of the article. That should be removed by an admin (if they decide that it's not applicable). Closenplay 11:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Closenplay 11:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Stubborn

Sign in to your instant messenger and tell me, right now, I am online. --- Realest4Life 16:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry LOL, I just like to know everything. Hehe. --- Realest4Life 16:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Got 'Em Hatin'

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Got 'Em Hatin', by Booyabazooka (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Got 'Em Hatin' fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Article has no content; user who created the page is requesting its deletion.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Got 'Em Hatin', please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject:G-Unit Records

Hi, There is a proposed WikiProject for G-Unit Records.

Please add your name to the list if you are interested.

See--WikiProject:G-Unit Records

--Shadyaftrmathgunit 11:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lil Wayne Carter 3 Front.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Wayne Carter 3 Front.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lil Wayne Carter 3 Back.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Wayne Carter 3 Back.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Yo what's up dude? Haven't talked to each other lately. You mad at me or something? Peace. --- Realest4Life 15:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Realist2 13:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

eminem

it is infact completely against wikipedia policy to remove citation tags, no matter how many there are. It doesnt mean that what is written isnt indeed true it just needs sourcing because people who dont agree with it have every right to delete it. Did you no that if a claim is not source it can be deleted by anyone , no questions asked. If I hated eminem I would have deleted it!! I put the citation tags there because I dont want people who do hate him to delete it. Take the intro for example just 1 sentance is sourced which means if someone really wanted to they could delete the intro bare that 1 sentence. Also a list of about 20 people are given that says they all had arguments with eminem but nothing is sourced. To say that a living person had an argument with someone without a crediable source is a civil offence and is sueable in a court. please do not remove the tags as it is considered vandalism under wikipedia policy, which could result in a ban. Also what is that wierd part on your user page, that declaration of heterosexuality is quiet strange, many will think you are trying to cover somthing up? Realist2 11:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

no not at all, i didnt mean to course you offence about your user page, it just appears a little over the top. The fact that some of the things are common sense doesnt mean they dont need tags trust me I no policy. I understand that it looks messy but thats not the point it just proves how badly sourced the article is. Ill ashume you have removed the tags in which case i will renew them. please do not delete them otherwise you will be issued will a vandalism notification.Realist2 13:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

sure, thanx. I would advise you to take the same actions against anyone who tries to remove tags.Realist2 13:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

The Greatest Story Ever Told (David Banner album)

Please do not move pages by cutting and pasting. Doing that results in two pages with edit histories. If you want the page to be moved, use the move tab at the top of the page or request a move. Admc2006 17:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

re to message - shadyaftrmathgunit

You're right, record label names shouldn't be shortened fir album and single infoboxes. I didn't know that, thanks.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 21:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Good idea, but it shouldn't be changed in Musical artist infoboxes.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 21:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

See Template:Infobox_musical_artist#Fields.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 21:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry i dont have yahoo messenger.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 21:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

kk! --Ayoleftyz 21:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at the advanced version of usage, Template:Infobox_Album#Advanced_usage. Also, only full dates should be linked, so 2007 should not be linked, but July 24, 2007 should be linked. --- Realest4Life 22:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
No idea, but since most infoboxes (including correctly formatted ones) drop the "Records" part, I say we don't change it. --- Realest4Life 22:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
O RLY? --- Realest4Life 22:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
No, same goes for December 4. Unless it is in the Month-Day-Year format you do not link. --- Realest4Life 22:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, 4 December 2007 and December 4, 2007 is the same thing. --- Realest4Life 22:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Maybe not, the comma did not appear there without me adding it, I think that only month-day should be linked. --- Realest4Life 22:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject g-unit started

The G-Unit wikiproject has been started, to view it click here-Wikipedia:WikiProject G-Unit Records.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 22:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (Swizz Beatz song)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Money In The Bank (Swizz Beatz song) to Money in the Bank (Swizz Beatz song). Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 01:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

MiniProject

I've created the MiniProject here. Now all we have to do is decide on the content (i.e. to-do list, pages to watch, etc.). --- Realest4Life 16:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Doctor's Advocate

Yeah I defintely think we can get some kind of collabo going for this album. I don't really edit albums that much, which is why I'm basing a lot of my edits on good/featured articles like Illmatic and Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers). Feel free to expand the article in any way you see fit. And it's good to see pages like The Resurrection of Hip Hop and and Tha Carter III being maintained from people who don't know the first thing about WP:REF. Spellcast 19:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Your Userpage

Hi, I didnt mean to offend you. I didnt remove the images for any reason than because I though that they were not allowed. I have had images removed from my userpage for the same reason by other users too. So sorry if I offended you, I didnt mean to. Also I didnt understand your message about King Mathers..? --The-G-Unit-Boss 16:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Her Name Is Nicole...

Yeah no worries, I'll keep an eye on the article. Some anon keeps putting an uncited track listing. He/she is likely to get blocked any minute now. Spellcast 09:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh and the sport team logos on your userpage will likely be removed by an admin (see WP:FU#Policy). I made that same mistake too when I started out here. Spellcast 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I just looked at the history of the page and people keep adding fake info. Do you revert the old school way? I'd recommend the twinkle script. One click reverts are too easy :D And I know no harm is being done on those nonfree images. But it is against policy to have them on userpages so they will have to be removed. Spellcast 09:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

still will kill

that is what akon says on the hook LightSpeed2 03:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Apex is the producer as seen on gunitworld.com Scott Boggie bought the beat from Apex but then sold it to 50 Cent. You can see this in gunitworld.com and Apex clears up all the rumors.

Even if Scott Boggie owns the beat, Apex Productionz produced it which is why i added it under production on 50 Cent's Curtis album. It's up to you what you want to edit but I'm going to stop editing that part.

Come & Go

Yeh same lol. I really wanted to hear Come & Go after he described it as In Da Club pt.2. Maybe it will be released on a mixtape afterwards. Leftover tracks normally are.

Anyway, ok. Ill leave "Multiple Sources" but I really do tink that we should have the "Confirmed Tracks" section as well because they have been confirmed by 50 Cent himself. Thanks --The-G-Unit-Boss 12:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeh We can keep both of them. Its better to have both than one which is wrong. --The-G-Unit-Boss 13:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Exclusive (album)

Why do you insist on changing it over and over again? --FSX-2007 23:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

It's all sourced, you just didn't look hard enough apparently. --FSX-2007 18:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Ain't nobody saying that it is the CONFIRMED track list. It has confirmed tracks. Underneath, it clearly says that those tracks have been recorded for the album.

Second, where is your source for changing the date to October 1st? --FSX-2007 18:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

For the tracklisting, your doing the exact same thing. So here is what I'm going to do. I will make a table. I will put those nineteen tracks in that table, and it will be posted on the page.

If it gets deleted, then we'll know why you change everything on that page. --FSX-2007 18:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

You are so damn hard headed. Your not the baddest thing on this place. The four or five tracks that YOU keep adding, that's the same exact thing.

"Those tracks are CONFIRMED."

That is what you said. The tracks that I put on the article are CONFIRMED as well. True, some may nto make he album, and they may not be int hat order. But the ones that you put up, same exact thing. How do you know they wil be on the album, I don't and neither do you. Things change. That's why I put the little note above the track list I posted. And what the hell are you talking about, everything I posted has been sourced!

But, if it's gonna be a fight changing the tracks and stuff, they should not even be on the article. --FSX-2007 19:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Now, why the hell are you changing the date back to October 1st?

What? A video isn't a reference, or source? Bull, I think when an artist holds a CD that has a list of songs he recorded for his album, it is pretty much confirmed, but whatever. The track list should be deleted all together. Nither one of us are right, and we can't agree on it. It should be delteed. --FSX-2007 19:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Answer my question first, why was the date changed back to October 1st.

Miniproject

I was wondering if I could join your and Realest4Life's miniproject? --Brooklyn Soldier 19:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

ok,but if a space opens up 4 me, can u tell me? --Brooklyn Soldier 18:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

do u know anybody who regulary edits hip hop articles and would be willing to adopt me in wikipedia to help me get my editing skills up? --Brooklyn Soldier 22:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

50 Cent and label

Hey Ayo, Deian recommended me to bring this up with you. Apparently 50 isn't signed to his own label G-Unit Records? I need some enlightenment here. Spellcast 14:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Nicole Scherzinger's "Physical"

This song is featured in the movie Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer and the credits say it was produced by Timbaland AND Danja. I added this info on the Her Name Is Nicole... page but this was deleted. I do NOT speculate. --NeptunianDroid 12:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Alphabetizing

It has nothing do with what "looks" or "feels" better, alphabetizing guest stars does not equal better looking. For examples see We the Best by DJ Khaled and Timbaland Presents Shock Value by Timbaland. As you see, the featured guests are listed in the order they appear, not alphabetically. Admc2006 07:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Curtis leak

Shouldnt we note that the curtis album has leaked? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimy67 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


Kanye West

Dude...I HAVE the album version of the song and it's completely different. Meaning one of two things: Kanye West re-did it himself, or Timbaland did it for him.

Go on VH1 Online and see for yourself. Timbaland re-made the beats.

"Even though it’s hit number three in the charts over here and has repeated a similar feat stateside, Kanye still wasn’t happy with Stronger when he heard it in a club alongside Timbaland’s Way I Are which is his favourite beat at the moment. So he dragged Timbo into the studio and got him to redo the drums on the track, ‘for people who look fly’ so we were treated to the new version, though to be honest I didn’t realise there was anything different until West mentioned it. "

http://www.rwdmag.com/articles/6015/Online-Review-Kanye-West--iGraduationi-.html

"Kanye has just wrapped up production on Graduation. One of his last bits of business was working with Timbaland to redo the drums on "Stronger."

http://www.vh1.com/artists/news/1567552/20070821/west_kanye.jhtml?rsspartner=rssMozilla

Now PLEASE leave it alone.

Kanye West-Graduation

Of course as a user who will not sign-in (I feel the obligation of an account is unneccessary and against the whole point of Wiki.) I haven't made any edits to the semi-protected page about Kanye's new album. With that said, I see you are reverting any edits mentioning a very, very notable and commonly-mentioned (in hip hop album articles) fact that the album has been leaked.

Whether it would be T.I. vs. T.I.P, Hip Hop is Dead, The Doctor's Advocate...or any other album, it is a precedent to mention the leak. Especially with the hype surrounding this album, it is absurd to not mention such a news development. It may not be in the best interest of those protecting copyrights, but this site is not meant to be a proponent of any specific organization. It may be unfortunate for record companies, but it's realistic and worth noting to mention the fact that the quite possibly most anticipated album (along with 50 Cent's "Curtis") has been leaked two weeks before its official release. This news will definitely affect sales and also may lead to changes in the near future of the album's content or release schedule. Such an ommittance seems like a play into the recording industry's hands rather than an honest contemporary encyclopedia entry.

Cheers, and I will attempt to make my way over to this Talk page to see a response if you so choose to respond.

66.71.40.153 07:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

???

Are you blind? It's red, not orange. --- Realest4Life 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Ooook! --- Realest4Life 14:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
OK, now that I completely owned you, answer my question on the Curtis talk page. --- Realest4Life 14:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Exec Prod.

Dr. Dre & Eminem exec prod. everything that's Shady & Aftermath, don't try to threaten me 'cause your fact aren't straight. (SmittysOnslaught 15:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC))

Past albums

So far the only albums that are both Shady & Aftermath are 50's, and look at the booklet for those past albums. Both Dre & Em are listed as exec. producers. If you can give me a source telling me they aren't for this album then I'll stop, Until then don't change it until the album comes out and we know for sure. P.S. Stop calling me Homeboy or Homie. Nothing personal, I just don't like it. (SmittysOnslaught 15:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC))

My apologies, but I'm not vandalizing anything, I simply got my facts wrong. (SmittysOnslaught 15:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC))

Album leak

Stop reverting my edits. The album leak is not notable because it adds no content to the article whatsoever. Every new album gets leaked today so it's nothing special. The only time where an album leak would be added to the article if it caused something in affect of the album. For instance, an album leak could cause an album to release a week earlier than expected would be a notable mention of the album leaking. Simply reverting and undoing my edits is just going to cause an edit war and possibly a full protection on pages where mentioned. Douglasr007 22:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

curtis

Ive heard the explicit retail of curtis...with no skips just wondering if you wanted to know?---Trimy67 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimy67 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Five Star General

Why do you keep reverting my tracklisting edits? They are NOT unreferenced! I listed a source for it, so why did you delete it? Tom Danson 22:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello??? Are you just pretending I don't exist? Tom Danson 02:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Curtis credits

I bought the album this morning. Unfortunately I don't have any image scanner. All I can provide is good faith but it's not enough for wiki. :/ However I posted the credits on music forum and someone posted a couple of pics from the booklet, maybe that'll help ;) you can find them here:


Curtis/Graduation Sales

Hey, wassup? I was wondering... did Kanye West's Graduation really sell 781, 000 copies already? Or is that simply a prediction? Same with Curtis selling 603, 000. I'd really appreciate if you give me an answer, as I'm seeking this information. - Obscure888

Graduation credits

hey man, it ain't a huge deal but i've been editing the production credits on Graduation as they appear, not sure if you just switched it back this time or the other times too. in any case i own the album and am just puttin' 'em as they're listed, so let me know the reason for switchin' it back. thanks OP Pizzle 18:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

"Carter Administration" is credited on the back of the album and on the front of the liners, below the tracklisting. i'm assuming it just means Jay and L.A. Reid, but i'm not entirely positive -- however i do know that the other guys listed as execs (Hip Hop, Gee Roberson) are outside of that group.

Toomp's credited as just Toomp in the album, i figure we should try to stick as closely to what the liners say as possible. OP Pizzle 23:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

is there an official wiki policy on this -- using "official" names or sticking to what the liners say?

and i ain't a 50 hater, like GRODT, but really Curtis is better? from the songs i've heard, i really doubt that. but to each his own and all that nice-soundin' stuff. OP Pizzle 05:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Sasha Callahan 03:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Good Life release

Please note that a songs release to iTunes, DOES NOT signify the actual single's release date. FMQB is a website that tracks radio play and gives the correct release dates for singles to the mainstream. That doesn't mean that stations can't start playing the song before that date, but that is the official mainstream release date of the song. So please stop reverting the edit to September 11, that is ONLY when the song was released digitally. WIKI-GUY-16 03:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I think I have more then made my point as to the differences between when a song is released digitally and when the actual single is released. This is getting out of hand, Wikipedia is supposed to be an accurate database, and September 11 is simply not the accurate date for when Good Life will be released as a single, and I have provided a reliable source, which you keep reverting. This is considered vandalism, and if you don't stop I will go to administer. I'm honestly not trying to be difficult, but I'm not going to let there be false information on the page either, and this revert war has to stop. WIKI-GUY-16 10:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Ur Opinion

Yo, i was wonderin' if u cud giv ur opinion on these merges and deletions ?

thanks G - keep it real - Real Compton G - Holla back 19:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Droughtisover2web.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Droughtisover2web.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Quotes

A pull quote is what you see in like magazines when they "magnify" a few lines from the text (see critical reception in Rich Girl). Block quotes are used if you continue writing in normal paragraphs. Hope that helps! Spellcast 04:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh and Template:Cquote says it shouldn't be used without good reason. WP:MOSQUOTE recommends block quotations for longer text. I know a lot of people use the pull quote (incorrectly), but blocks are usually the way to go. Spellcast 04:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Graduation references

Please see the talk page for a more detailed explanation of why I keep adding {{reflist}}. I really think normal sized references don't really belong anywhere, they aren't part of the article and are merely footnotes linking you to where you can do further corroborating research. -Mike Payne (T • C) 13:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

West Coast hip hop Wikiproject

Yo, Ryda came up wit an idea 4 a West Coast Hip hop project, and we think ur editz wud really help the project, cud ya add ur name here if ur interested. Thnx G - Keep It Real - Real Compton G 20:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Biiitch

When you can, go online, I GOTTA tell you what the fuck happened today lmao. Funniest shit ever. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 03:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

roc boys (jay z song)

Hey on the roc boys song, it seems like that kanye west has vocals in the backgroundTrimy67 00:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah Thought so i didnt want to addanything until i had someone agree with meTrimy67 00:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Re:Great job

Hi, Thanks for the message. I mean, I prefer working together with you rather than always arguing. I think recently we have been editing together well. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't reply quicker, I didnt see the message. I don't have an IM fo this. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 11:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't it annoy you when a new album is coming out and everybody keeps adding the track times etc. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 20:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I do have a private Instant Messenger, but if I created another one to use on here I would really sign on too often so its kinda pointless. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 20:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

The-Dream

Hey, I noticed that you undid a revision by 74.167.140.208 saying that The-Dream is not a rapper...maybe you should hear Nivea's second album Complicated before you say he is not a rapper. He clearly RAPPED on "I Can't Mess With You" and "Okay (Part II)". ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 03:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I wasn't trying to come at you wrong or anything like that, it's just that before Shawty Is a 10 came out, I had only heard him rap. It seems like some people keep forgetting that he did stuff before Umbrella and Bed. I guess you can say that Nivea stuff was during his winter period, lol. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 04:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Do I smell incivility?

I've been seeing your revisions, and a lot of them had one word, "Unreferenced." Can't we make a section called "potential tracks?"

P.S. You tone borders on incivility, and if you mention people being blocked for unreferenced comments, I hope they bring up that incivility is also grounds for blocking. Tom Danson 05:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

lil wayne the carter 3 LEAK

that quote is old i gave a new sorce READ SORCES BEFORE DELETING —Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrybauer (talk • contribs) 03:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE USE UP TO DATE SORCES CHECK THIS XXL ARTICLE IS A SECONDARY SORCE NOT A PRIMARY

JUST READ IT BEFORE YOU RETRACT EVERYTHING

http://www.vh1.com/artists/news/1572846/20071026/lil_wayne.jhtmlhenry 03:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.