Talk:Aylesbury United F.C.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aylesbury United F.C. article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Buckinghamshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

	English football Portal The article on Aylesbury United F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football.
	This article is supported by the England task force.

[edit] A note on Manual of Style

I have made a minor edit (but an important one which quite a few users are unaware of, including me!) with regards to the sub-heading of External links. According to this page, the external link section should always have the term of External links. If all articles in Wikipedia were to follow this style, the articles in this project would be more consistent in MOS format, raising the professionalism of this encyclopedia. Granted, this may seem such an unimportant observation on my part to some users, but if the idea of consistency is not followed as close as possible, new users and outsiders of the Wikipedia community would take this encyclopedia less seriously. In my humble opinion, it is the observance of these minor detalis that seperate the elite encyclopedias to the good ones. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 02:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)