Talk:Axiom of power set
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Subset in what model?
Maybe somebody should add a note to the article explaining that the "subset" referred to is the notion of subset within the theory (in an attempt to ward off the confusion you typically get when somebody first hears that ZFC has countable models). -- Cwitty 01:11, 22 November 2003
isn't it possible to replace (∀ D, D ∈ C → D ∈ A) by C ⊂ A which I would find easier to understand.
- not really, as ⊂ then needs to be defined, lengthening the statement --Henrygb 11:18, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cartesian product defined by just one powerset operation -- I think?
The article states that the Cartesian product of X and Y is a subset of the power set of the power set of the union of X and Y. But isn't it a subset of the power set of the union of X and Y? Why the double power set? Am I missing something?
X = {a, b} Y = {c, d}
XuY = {a, b, c, d}
P(XuY) = {{}, {a}, {b}, {c}, {d}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {a, d}, {b, c}, {b, d}, {c, d}, {a, b, c}, {a, b, d}, {a, c, d}, {b, c, d}, {a, b, c, d}}
XxY = {{a, c}, {a, d}, {b, c}, {b, d}}
I probably am. But what is it, I wonder... 24.238.113.229 (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- You are confusing unordered pairs with ordered pairs. JRSpriggs (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Yes. Yes I am. Is that detail too elementary to be included in the article? It clarifies a lot, at least for me. 24.238.113.229 (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- That's quite helpful, thanks! I have been browsing through Wikipedia's articles on Set Theory for some time, and while I am generally able to work through them, there are cases when I happen to be unacquainted with some basic idea (in this case (x, y) = {{x}, {x, y}}), which prevents me from following the argument. I think the problem is that the dense nature of mathematical argumentation and notation often obscures details that would, if spelled out, be heavily wikified. As a mathematical autodidact, I would love it if Wikipedia would spell such things out just a bit more, so that I could more easily find and rectify the gaps in my knowledge. 24.238.113.229 (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-