Talk:Axe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force

	This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
	This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
Additional information: B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. Feel free to make short comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. This article is included in the 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection, or is a candidate for inclusion in the next version. Please maintain high quality standards and, if possible, stick to GFDL-compatible images.

Contents 1 photo comment 2 Automatic axe 3 Edits 10/06 4 Wordings 5 Axe Crew 6 List of manufacturers 7 Spelling Variant 8 Possible Additions? 9 Francisca 10 ETA symbol 11 Fair use rationale for Image:ETAlogo.jpg 12 Fair use rationale for Image:ETAlogo.jpg 13 Simple Machine vs Compound Machine 14 Hammer Axe 15 Aylesford

[edit] photo comment

Are we sure that the second photo depicts an axe and not an adze?

[edit] Automatic axe

How about this thing: David.Monniaux 18:27, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

400px

[edit] Edits 10/06

Tried to group types, edited introduction, edited refernce to mortise axe and twybill ( a twybil is not an axe.)

[edit] Wordings

In the "Symbolism, ritual and folklore" section, the following sentence does not seem to make sense: "In folklore, stone axes were sometimes believed to be thunderbolts and were used to guard buildings against lightning..." It could be just me, but can anyone reword this?

Hafting:

Stone hand axes were found hafted to wood preserved in bogs. I have no time to reference this. --Denny 11.13.05

[edit] Axe Crew

Is there any reason we're keeping the "Axe Crew" on this page?

[edit] List of manufacturers

I believe this should be removed per Wikipedia is not a directory. Luigizanasi 18:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling Variant

I've seen axe spelt ax with no e in some places- should this be listed as a variant?

I think that's the British version. But Wikipedia is international, so I'd agree with you204.95.23.122 01:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thats not a british version. I'm british and i've never seen it used in britain.

Ax is the tool, axe is the weapon. 67.188.172.165 22:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

ax (w/o e) is the preferred U.S. spelling. It's all right to be international, but "occasionally ax" is just plain inaccurate.167.115.255.20 15:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Geof Garvey, LINK Book Development

I agree that "occassionally" is far from accurate. 67.188.172.165 02:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possible Additions?

• Masakari
• Sagaris

Pickaxe should also be added. --Chuckleberry 22:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Francisca

Theblindsage 23:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Franciscas WERE hafted. The pic on the Francisca page shows only the heads.

Seconded. In fact I'm going to delete this rubbish, a year on! Salvianus (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ETA symbol

Is there any reason to have the ETA picture on the page? What does it add to this article as a whole? I would be better in it's place to have a schematic diagram of the different parts of the ax or something similar.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ETAlogo.jpg

Image:ETAlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ETAlogo.jpg

Image:ETAlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Simple Machine vs Compound Machine

The third paragraph states that an axe is a simple machine, but goes on to state how an axe uses both a wedge and a lever. Would that not disqualify it from being called a simple machine, and thereby make it a compound machine? Primalmoon (talk) 23:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hammer Axe

What is a hammer axe? Although this page has some information about it, it doesn't describe it. How about a picture? JohnLeroy (talk) 02:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Will describe, don't know how to upload pics yet. Salvianus (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aylesford

"Hammer axes are an often overlooked tool in the axe field. They were first developed in Switzerland but soon migrated west to North America and Aylesford in particular." - What on Earth is this? It was a common Roman tool! Aylesford?! Deleting... Salvianus (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)