User talk:Avillia/Archive4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] A breath of fresh air

Thank you for your comment on WP:ANI. I won't even say it was support -- you are only defending the basic Wikipedia principles -- but so far no one has indicated that Wikipedians have any rights other than those briefly granted (and as easily withdrawn) by admins. I doubt they will bend, but thanks anyway. -- User:BlindVenetian 21:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit on AN

Hello Avillia :)

I just saw [1]. While you obviously did not mean it, this edit could be taken as uncivil as you called the edits of other editor's "crap." It isn't a big deal, but I would appreciate it if you could try and phrase things in a more polite manner in the future so as to not cause additional wikiStrife. Happy editing! -- Where 23:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: User:147.10.119.170

That would be my IP. The first time my brother started I got him to revert it in the end. He is just messing around and if he continues blocking the ip without me would be ok. --Adam1213 Talk + 01:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Do you frequent on Freenode?

Very rarely. RadioKirk 19:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

That's why it's so rare, I can never remember how to do the damned commands... :) RadioKirk 20:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
You're not responding, not sure if I did it right, but it seems so. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israeli

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israeli. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israeli/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israeli/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 13:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for trolling, disruption, and frivolous violation of WP:POINT in a serious deletion discussion. I can't understand what use such an edit could possibly have, but it's obvious you're simply trolling. I am going to grant you your wish however; you are added to my list of people I've blocked. --Cyde↔Weys 17:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I was already on that list. --Avillia (Avillia me!) 19:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Looks like you shouldn't have trolled at all, then. --Cyde↔Weys 19:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux

In case you're interested... Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Objection! on Xplay

Hi there!

You posted that an episode of 'Xplay' mentioned the Objection! site... you wouldn't to have any more information on this would you? MrD 16:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Great way to put it.

[2] Incredible. Great succinct summarisation. ~ c. tales *talk* 03:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't ascribe malice to others.

Hi. In your recent vote on a TfD, you claimed the template was "Made for the only purpose of engaging in edit warring", please be aware that this is a charge of wrong doing and deliberate bad intent. It could be taken as a personal attack, and is generaly a bad thing to do without anything to back it up.

You claim it's been used as part of an edit war, then claim it's 'not in any articles'. It's not in any articles because people wanting the template deleted removed it from the articles it was in. Ironicly, I've not been restoring it's use, to avoid charge of edit waring. --Barberio 06:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not act unilaterly

The TfD for Template:Unverifiable-external-links failed not once, but twice. Please do not continue to act on your opinion about this template by removing references to it. Discussion on the TfD did find that a slight majority opposed this template, but that a significant amount of people did belive the template useful. In this case the template is kept, and may be used.

Deleting references to the template from Wikipedia in general may be considered Disrupting behaviour. This is my second warning to you over your behaviour in this matter. --Barberio 11:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not act unilaterly

The TfD for Template:Unverifiable-external-links failed not once, but twice. Please do not continue to act on your opinion about this template by removing references to it. Discussion on the TfD did find that a slight majority opposed this template, but that a significant amount of people did belive the template useful. In this case the template is kept, and may be used.

Deleting references to the template from Wikipedia in general may be considered Disrupting behaviour. This is my second warning to you over your behaviour in this matter. --Barberio 11:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment

I shouldn't need to tell you this, as you've been around a while, but this was totally inappropriate, and should not be done, even as a joke. —Mets501 (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ArbCom Elections comments

Good evening. Your comment at Giano's voting page was moved to the talk page. The maximum length of comments on the voting page itself should be two short sentences. This determination was reached on prior consensus on the ArbCom Elections talk page. For your convenience, I have moved the comment appropriately, and have included a link from the vote page to the comment on the talk page - but feel free to edit my move to your preference. However, extended comments, like the ones you provided, are best placed on the talk page. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Thank you. - ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] oh hai thar

Y helo thar!!11onetyelevn1! Wuts goin on hear? ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 04:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)