User talk:Avidor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Just to talk

Hey. Putting old conflicts aside, and noting that I know I've been a pompous ass toward you (also noting I think you've been the same to me), I'd be very interested in constructively discussing PRT with an opponent. You're obviously a very adement opponent, and I'd like to hear what you think in a more calm context than a wikipedia talk page. Perhaps you'll convince me of something. What do you say? Fresheneesz 06:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Fine ignore my friendly request. This simply proves to me that you don't care about transportation, you just care about your agenda. I'm not going around saying light rail is a scam, or that heavy rail is a scam, or busses or anything. However all those things lose money, and produce some sort of drain on our economy. This is your argument for what a PRT system would do - the same thing that current systems do. I'm disappointed that you're such an unkind person. Fresheneesz 22:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't know how you live with yourself. You have the worst qualities of the news-media today. You are an evil human being. Fresheneesz (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

If you continue to use wikipedia as a soap box, I will bring your case to administrative review. Please stop abusing this website. Fresheneesz (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree.... I welcome arbitration....Avidor (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original Research

With respect to SkyTran and ADA, please read WP:OR. You need to find a reliable source that says SkyTran is not ADA compliant. What you are attempting to do is original research, quoting the ADA standard and interpreting it for SkyTran. That is inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

The closest we have to a reliable source for SkyTran ADA compliance is this, which claims: Designated stops have electric lift capability to special vehicles for ADA compliance. So your information about ADA compliance may be out of date.

In any case, you have a history of debating issues and posting your opinions on the PRT talk pages, and you've started up again recently (see the archived San Francisco debate, which had nothing to do with the article whatsoever). You have been informed multiple times that this is inappropriate, and I'm once again informing you of that fact - see WP:SPAM and WP:SOAP. I'm asking you again to cease this inappropriate use of the talk pages. I will immediately archive such content unless there is direct relevance to the article in question. ATren (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

And you have a history too, ATren... if you are concerned that I have broken a rule, please take it up with an admin... Avidor (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I've already told you my plan of action. If you post something that is clearly WP:OR, WP:SPAM or WP:SOAP, I will archive it immediately. There is no need for an admin to get involved. ATren (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)