Talk:AutoShare
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Research
I’m a PhD student at Northwestern University doing research on hourly car rental services like ZipCar and iGo, and I'm looking for interview participants to talk about their car rental experiences. I'm based in Toronto, but we can arrange to do a phone interview if you're not local. Please contact me if you’re interested in participating. Thanks! Bokonon6 14:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
How can this be speedy when it's noteable and verifiable as a car sharing service. We have others like it on Wikipedia already and I'm planning to create the rest of them as well. Tedernst | talk 23:41, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- I believe it is because the information is "very" lacking. Are you planning on adding more information about this SPECIFIC company? Noah 23:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Moved from my talk--Light current 00:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] AutoShare
There are quite a few car sharing organiations (see Template:car sharing that have articles and more that don't. AutoShare is the first one I've created and I plan to create the others as well, but I see you've marked it for speedy deletion. Why is that? Thanks! Tedernst | talk 23:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Because it appears almost solely to redirect to website pages and has no other info. This is against WP policy.
[edit] Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files
Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files. All content added to Wikipedia may have to be edited mercilessly to be included in the encyclopedia. By submitting any content, you agree to release it for free use under the GNU FDL. 2 Wikipedia articles are not:
# Mere collections of external links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding a list of content-relevant links to an article; however,
- I don't understand the relevance of this policy to this article. Could you please spell it out for me? Tedernst | talk 00:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Also, it just occured to me that the problem might be the template and not the article itself. Is that so? Either one, or both should be addressed, if they are the problem. Tedernst | talk 00:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes
- Mere collections of external links or excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia.--Light current 00:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- You can do that with my blessings--Light current 00:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)