Talk:Autism Research Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is biased. All I did so far was flag it for neutrality, but I'm going to work on trying to make it more objective. I don't really know what I'm doing just yet, so I hope I do ok. Andi1235 17:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I've put in a request on the Neutrality Project page for this article, as getting into a neutral POV state is a bit beyond me, and more experienced heads should probably step in, although I'd be happy to help. Andi1235 17:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I did my best -- I hope others make it better.Andi1235 17:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

there seems to be surprisingly little critical coverage of the Institute on the web (or I'm missing something obvious). I've blogged a little about their recommendation of secretin [1] - and a lot of their research and treatment recommendations seem to range from daft to scary - but google seems to bring up v few critical results. It's hard to know how to make the article more balanced without OR. DAN and DAN doctors have been more widely criticised, and maybe some of that could be folded into this article? Jon m