User talk:Aussie Evil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding Jigglypuff

If you disagree with this article's existence, or the current location of its contents, page blanking is not the appropriate response. You're entirely welcome to discuss your concerns on the article's talk page, and/or the talk page of the article you think it should be moved to/merged with. Your changes have been undone. - Vianello (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

As I'm currently working on the article to establish notability and improve it to decent quality, I fail to see how "pokemon shouldn't have individual articles" is hardly a valid reason to suggest a merge. If you have something beyond that as reasoning, feel free to bring it up on talk page for the article--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Either all Pokémon have articles or they should all be in a list -- NO EXCEPTIONS. I've renom'ed them for mergers. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 15:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
And what kind of logic is that supposed to be. Show one policy that says such.
Newsflash: only some of them are notably. The rest, indeed, are list material. And some of those on lists should in turn be made back into full articles, but it's really a small pool in that regard.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage temporary deletion

Because even though we had reverted the vandalism from User:137.164.143.116, the personal information was still visible in the edit summaries. I deleted the page and restored everything but the edit with the vandal summary. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Request

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 137.164.143.116 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Woody (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Calotterylogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Calotterylogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)