Talk:Austrian National Socialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Fascism, an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to the fascist ideology, its impact on history and present-day organizations closely linked to both of these (ideology and history). See project page, and discussion. This article may be listed on an index of fascist movements or people. Such listing may be controversial; feel free to contribute to discussions there. The presence of this Talk page-only template only implies that the subject is of interest to the associated WikiProject.

This site needs to be renamed "Austrian Nazism" and this a spin off from the article Early National Socialism/draft. I don't believe you did this Andy. First you steal my work, redirect the article and place my work in your Nazi article. you tell me that I can not make "National Socialism" an article all by itself and then you make another article called Early National Socialism. I don't beleive this. This is not right.WHEELER 22:59, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

"Steal your work"? What a silly thing to say. Work on wikipedia doesn't belong to any individual. There's nothing to steal. AndyL 13:13, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

It is plain and simple, You stole my work Andy. You have no manners nor etiquette. You did not consult me and you did not ask. You lay down the law for me, but then you do what ever you please. I am going above your head now. You did not act rightly towards me.WHEELER 13:47, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

You have no manners, and no virtue Andy. Like you are some kind of authority which you are not.WHEELER 14:40, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I WANT TO LET EVERYONE WHO COMES HERE TO KNOW THAT ANDY STOLE THIS MATERIAL FROM AN ARTICLE I DID, DELETED THE ORGINAL WORK, MOVED IT FIRST TO THE NAZISM ARTICLE AND THEN MADE A SEPERATE ARTICLE ON THIS. THIS IS STOLEN MATERIAL. THIS IS UNPROFESSIONAL AND UNCALLED FOR. AND HE IS AN ADMINISTRATOR. WHEELER 23:19, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

WHEELER, you are leaving me little alternative but to complain about your personal attack above. I will give you 24 hours to formally retract your comments and apologise.

Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, the articles on it "belong" to no one and are not written in anyone's name. I can't "steal" an article first of all because it doesn't belong to you and secondly because I'm not claiming it as my own. How can something be stolen when it doesn't belong to anyone and when the "thief" doesn't put it in his possession or claim it as his own?

Perhaps if you stopped having such a possessive attitude to wikipedia and stopped considering an article to be "yours" you wouldn't constantly find yourself in conflict?

All I did is salvage the one small part of your article that wasn't POV. Perhaps you prefer the alternative which is the current move to simply have your article deleted entirely?AndyL 05:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)