Talk:Australian Ringneck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Australian Ringneck has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 15, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles. To participate, visit the project page.

Port Lincoln Parrot should probably redirect to Australian Ringneck, as that seems to be the currently accepted scientific classification common name. --Takver 14:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I have a check on the name this evening, and if so, we can request a move by an admin. Kim van der Linde at venus 14:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Shall leave it to you to check and contact an admin if a move is necessary.--Takver 14:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


This page needs to be moved to Australian ring neck or seperated back out to each sub species as the Port Lincoln Parrot is only a sub species name. The article should have the status for each sub species as the Twenty Eight has been classified as threatened. Gnangarra 00:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Moved back to Australian ring neck Gnangarra

[edit] Endemic

Although endemic is technically correct in the context, the general use is for more restricited areas. Maybe we just should avoid the confusion. Kim van der Linde at venus 13:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Subspecies status

I do not think the subspecies status is now needed anymore, so we can remove that as the status is the same for all subspecies. Kim van der Linde at venus 02:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

agreed Gnangarra 06:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good article reassessment

This article does not seem to be up to standard so I have nominated it for GAR. Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 12:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

As a result of the discussion at WP:GAR, the consensus decision was to keep the article. Some minor fixes were noted, those were made, and there was no support to delist the article. An archive of this discussion can be found at: Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 32. Please continue to improve this article. Happy editing! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)