Talk:Australian Army Cadets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Australian Army Cadets is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian military. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Training warrant officer?
Im not aware that such a position exists, I have added OPSWO since it definately exists, if nobody can confirm TrainingWO somebody should remove it
- I'm not aware that Operations Warrant Officer exists but Training Warrant Officer exists. ExtraDry 15:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] needs new logo
124.189.224.26 05:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Oldest Cadet Unit?
I'm confident that Scotch College had the first cadet unit in Australia, formed in 1851. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Bryce (talk • contribs) 09:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
Scotch College taught drill to students during the 1850s but did not have a cadet unit as such Will567
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AAC Logo.gif
Image:AAC Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ban on use of CRP
I have removed reference on the ban on use of CRP in 2007 for the following reasons:
- The cause of death for CDT Francis is still subject to coronial investigation so definitively labelling the cause of death as an anaphylactic reaction to the Beef Satay ration pack meal is inappropriate at this time.
- The event is listed in the historical overview for the organisation - this event is not sufficiently significant in the overall history of the organisation to warrant inclusion in this section. There have been numbers of other deaths in the organisation, for a variety of reasons, over the years - none of which have been mentioned here. AusTerrapin (talk) 04:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Highest OC rank
It states that "Currently the highest rank an OOC can hold in the AAC is Colonel (AAC). There is one posting available at this rank being the Deputy Commander AAC." However, my School-based unit commander was recently promoted to Colonel. And I'm pretty sure he isn't the Deputy Commander AAC. Any ideas? Oranges91 (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
What unit are you at? If he wasn't the Deputy Commander AAC, are you sure hes not a Lt. Colonel? I can only think of one unit that has a Col. and that is CCCU, and that Col. is the Deputy Commander AAC. 8:58 3 March 2008 user:Imperator —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imperator101 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Melbourne High School Cadet Unit. He was promoted to full Colonel in August last year. And it's been confirmed since that Colonel Axup is indeed the Deputy Commander AAC Oranges91 (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AACLogo.jpg
Image:AACLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
