Talk:Australian Antarctic Division

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Antarctica Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Antarctica, which collaborates on articles related to Antarctica. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale by the Australian Antarctic Territory work group. Related work groups: Australian Antarctic Territory work group

Portal	Australian Antarctic Division is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] AAD or AGAD

A few years ago, Australian Antarctic Division was in the process of being renamed to Australian Government Antarctic Division, I assume largely to separate AGAD from private or commercial expeditions. Most things were changed, including the logo and web banners etc, all except the url aad.gov.au and an few other things. Now, it seems the DEWR has gone back on the name change and has reverted back to Australian Antarctic Division.

So my question, are they sticking with AAD? Should all AGAD references on WP be removed? Thanks. --Breno ^talk 09:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes we are officially back to AAD after a brief flirtation with AGAD. In so far as anything is certain in Government the change will be permenant so yes, all references to should go back to AAD. Gdenyer 09:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks. --Breno ^talk 11:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)