Talk:Australia Council for the Arts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Modern-day relevance
Shouldn't there be a section on the organisation's viability and worth? Apparently it can only fund 60 to 70 per cent of its clientele.Hide&Reason 07:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Move
Why was this article moved here? On Wikipedia we generally title articles according to common usage, and in this case, the title should be as it was: Australia Council.--cj | talk 10:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree. How do you know that Australia Council is common usage? The logo itself says Australia Council for the Arts and that is where most people would hear about it. --Mdhowe 03:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I doesn't particularly matter, but a search of a news database yields more results for "Australia Council". The real issue here is the cut-and-paste move; please in future only use the move function so page histories remain intact.--cj | talk 12:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Right, sorry about that. I will remember that next time. About the title, a search for "Australia Council" will turn up more results because of the shear number of "Australia Council's for Something or Other", seriously, there are heaps of them. I think this is the best way to avoid ambiguity. --Mdhowe 01:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I doesn't particularly matter, but a search of a news database yields more results for "Australia Council". The real issue here is the cut-and-paste move; please in future only use the move function so page histories remain intact.--cj | talk 12:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)