Talk:Austin Stevens: Snakemaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Austin Stevens: Snakemaster article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Sounds like a whole lot of speculation to me. I think the criticism and controversey section should be removed because only Frankboy wants it and he hates Austin Stevens. So that is what I am going to do.

This is not any sort of bias. Although these sources are seemingly unreliable (forums), they are from zoo curators such as Jim Harrison of the Kentucky Reptile Zoo and a few others. I have a mixed reaction of the show, I am a fan of the show in fact, its just that some of the show seems staged. Frankyboy5 00:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Can anyone confirm at all if it's even *meant* be be viewed as totally serious? I was never sure when watching it whether it was in fact supposed to be a very clever Steve Irwin spoof. Interesting and educational, yes, but there was always a strange edge of faint ludicrousness and unreality to it all. 82.46.180.56 (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

It in fact seems that some of this article is staged.Austin Stevens

Your're not Austin!!! LOL!!! Frankyboy5 18:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Wouldn't it just be alot easier if you removed the criticism and controversey section. First of all at a most crucial but simple level you cannot prove your sources are real just like that bloke claiming to be austin stevens cannot prove it is indeed him. Secondly, Austin Stevens is not really big enough to create what most would consider a controversey. Most do not know who he is, but if they had any interest in the show it would be unfair to give them information for which there is no solid proof. Thanks for the episode index though, that is helpful. MaxZorin7

There is no solid proof that he didn't abuse the animals either. Frankyboy5 23:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

As there is no proof that any of us including you have or have not. We just have to go with what we do know. MaxZorin7

Here we go again with the speculation. I won't allow it to stand. MaxZorin7

You keep calling yourself MaxZorin when you are an IP user!! Anyway, you can keep the article the same, but it's completely true as sometimes the footage pauses and they show that to be a picture. Frankyboy5 06:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me keep the article the way I think it should be. Zorin

[edit] phhhhhhhhhhhotos

no photos?6jiko —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.27.236.137 (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC).