Australian federal election, 1969

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Federal election major party leaders
< 1966 1969 1972 >

Liberal
John Gorton
Prime Minister
Parliament: 20 years
Leader since: 1968
Division: Higgins

WIN


Labor
Gough Whitlam
Opposition leader
Parliament: 17 years
Leader since: 1967
Division: Werriwa

Federal elections were held in Australia on 25 October 1969. All 125 seats in the House of Representatives, no Senate seats were up for election. The incumbent Liberal Party of Australia led by Prime Minister of Australia John Gorton with coalition partner the Country Party led by John McEwen (who had also served as Prime Minister for three weeks after Harold Holt's disappearance) defeated the Australian Labor Party led by Gough Whitlam. Even though the ALP lost, the election was seen as a good result for them as it made significant gains against the Coalition.

House of Reps (IRV) — 1969-72 — Turnout 94.97% (CV) — Informal 2.54%
  Party Votes % Swing Seats Change
  Australian Labor Party 2,870,792 46.95 +6.97 59 +18
  Liberal Party of Australia 2,125,987 34.77 -5.37 46 -15
  Country Party 523,232 8.56 -1.28 20 -1
  Democratic Labor Party 367,977 6.02 -1.29 0 0
  Australia Party 53,646 0.88 * 0 0
  Independents 141,090 2.31 +0.85 0 -1
  Other 31,394 0.51 0 0
  Total 6,114,118     125 +1
  Liberal/Country coalition WIN 49.80 -7.10 66 -16
  Australian Labor Party 50.20 +7.10 59 +18

See Australian Senate election, 1967 and Australian Senate election, 1970 for Senate compositions.


[edit] Issues

The 1969 election centred heavily on the two leaders, John Gorton and Gough Whitlam. Both were leading their respective parties in an election for the first time. Gorton had initially been very popular, and was publicly promoted as a "average Aussie bloke". This image was boosted by his record of wartime service and his craggy battered profile (the result of a wartime injury). However, he gradually gained a reputation for being erratic and unnecessarily confrontational. By the time of the 1969 Election campaign his attempts to alter long standing Liberal Party policies with regard to federal-state powers, and foreign affairs had alienated the more conservative sections of the Liberal Party, and various state Liberal leaders (Henry Bolte and Robin Askin in particular).

Whitlam, by contrast, had reformed the ALP and abandoned unpopular policies such as the once-dominant White Australia Policy, as well as the commitment to socialism still held by many members on the left of the party. He presented a sleek and modern image which was able to win over new voters to his cause. Whitlam had also managed to restore and heal the party's image as an electable alternative, something that had been impossible after the Labor Party split in 1955. Under his leadership, Whitlam had also attracted back many Catholic voters who had previously dumped Labor due to its infighting and factionism. In addition, the Coalition had been in office for 20 years and was seen as becoming tired and unfocused, and there were growing concerns over Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War. The ALP went into the election with a small caucus and could have a good hope of gaining seats.

Despite a Coalition campaign depicting Labor as a party dominated and controlled by union bosses, the result was very close. Labor became the biggest single party in the House, taking 59 seats--an 18-seat swing from 1966. They also won a bare majority of the two-party preferred vote, winning 50.2 percent to the Coalition's 49.8 percent--a 7.1 percent swing from 1966. However, Labor came up four seats short of taking power. Nonetheless, it set the stage for Labor winning government three years later.

[edit] References

  • University of WA election results in Australia since 1890
  • AEC 2PP vote
  • Prior to 1984 the AEC did not undertake a full distribution of preferences for statistical purposes. The stored ballot papers for the 1983 election were put through this process prior to their destruction. Therefore the figures from 1983 onwards show the actual result based on full distribution of preferences.