User talk:Aung win

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Heads of United Kingdom Missions

Thanks for showing an interest in the article. I noticed that you changed the name of the British ambassador to Burma from Vicky Bowman to Mark Channing. Whilst it is correct that Bowman is leaving the embassy in Rangoon, I believe that Mark Channing will replace her only in July. If that is correct, until then, the position will probably be filled by either Bowman or by a chargé d'affaires. If you could clarify what the situation is until then, or confirm when the transition is finalised, that would be superb. Bastin8 23:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Mr Mark Canning has been appointed to be Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Union of Myanmar (Burma) in succession to Ms Vicky Bowman who will be transferring to another Diplomatic Service appointment.

above texts can be found at http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029391629 it was made on 16/05/06

and the word 'has been appointed' mean he is already apponinted as an ambassador, so he is the ambassador, there is no two ambassador at the same time .Aung win 04:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

It states, "Mr Canning will take up his new appointment in July 2006." I don't know whether his credentials have been accepted, nor do I know the terms of acceptance if they have. However, it is common for credentials to be presented many months after the home government appoints the diplomat, and also common for the conditions of acceptance to stipulate a later date on which the title of 'Ambassador' is conferred (for example, while the diplomat is undergoing language training). Therefore, whilst is it correct that there cannot be two ambassadors at once, that press release does not explain who is the ambassador at the moment. That is why I asked for confirmation from a source other than the FCO. If you have seen another source stating that he is now Ambassador Canning, I'll accept the change. Unless I have confirmation that the new ambassador has taken up the title, it is my usual practice to update the list only when he or she takes up office.
Both the British government and the Court of St James's refuse to recognise the junta's name change.Bastin8 12:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing talk page messages

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Paul C 19:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] not vandalism

Copied from User talk:Bastin8

although UK dosent reconized burman as myanmar , its offical name is myanmar , and this wikipedia have nutral point of view and , you shouldnt have take my contribution as vandalism.

use your common sence, Myanmar is Myanmar, Burma is only named after the sound of Myanmar by the british long time ago upon the colonizing of Myanmar, you can read that clearly here at Myanmar

i dont care wheather the british reconized burman as myanmar, and this is on wikipedia and , it should be viewed as netural point of view as it is the offical policy of wikipedia.

and clearly wikipedia is not the offical webpage of british goverment, myanmar shoild be written as myanmar —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aung win (talk • contribs) 21:21, 6 July, 2006 (UTC).

It's not the official webpage of the British government, but the article in question is a list of positions within the British Diplomatic Service. Since 'Ambassador to Myanmar' isn't a diplomatic posting, but 'Ambassador to Burma'(or, more strictly, Ambassador and Minister Plenipotentiary to the Union of Burma) is, it's listed under 'Burma'. See the talk page. If you change it back, despite this second explanation, it can only be considered vandalism. Bastin 21:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Controversial statement regarding Sao Pan Thee

Hello. Thanks for adding the Sai Sai Kham Hlaing article to Wikipedia. It has come to my attention that you have added a controversial statement regarding Sao Pan Thee, who was identified as a hoax recently. If you can add a citation to support the statement (see Wikipedia:Citing sources), please do so. And, do not remove the fact template until you or someone else has done so, because that is considered vandalism. Hintha 05:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma/Myanmar

Hi! Please join us! Chris 13:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] proposed rename of Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma/Myanmar

A new user has proposed the rename of our project. I intentionally used both names so that all views would be represented. But I would like your thoughts as to which name we should choose, Burma or Myanmar, or leave it like it is. Please share your thoughts, thank you. Chris 19:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

This user comes from Burma.

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Revolutionstarburma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Revolutionstarburma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Organizing members list on Myanmar Wikiproject

Hello! Would you like to have your say on how the members list on the Myanmar Wikiproject should be organized? You can participate here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Myanmar (Burma)/Members. Thanks and good day. --Hintha 02:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing Categories

Please refrain from removing categories from the articles without prior discussing on the project page. Any further uni-literal actions will be reported to Wikipedia. Okkar 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Revolutionstarburma.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Revolutionstarburma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Maha Chakri Sirindhorn.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Maha Chakri Sirindhorn.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. GDonato (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Sai phone htoo

A tag has been placed on Sai phone htoo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dougie WII 07:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Order_of_Kanbawza_ribbon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Order_of_Kanbawza_ribbon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 20:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)