From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Licensing email exchange
On 7/18/07, Ken Meltz <KenMeltz@-----.org> wrote:
> >That sounds just fine to me, Garrett. Let me know if there's
> >anything I need do but say okay to this...Ken Meltz
>
> >I'd recommend the GFDL/CC-BY-SA dual license: that's what I use for
> >mine. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PikePlaceMarketCrowd.jpg
> >for an example. By the terms of the Attribution-ShareAlike license,
> >your name must be attached to any further reuse of the picture.
> >
> >On 7/18/07, Ken Meltz <KenMeltz@-----.org> wrote:
> >>Which do you recommend? Do any of these identify the photographer by
> >>name? Not interested in payment, obviously....Ken
> >>
> >>>Thanks, Ken! For the record, are you releasing the photo under the GNU
> >>>Free Documentation License
> >>>(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_License)
> >>>and/or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 license
> >>>(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/)? If those don't work
> >>>for you, take a gander at
> >>>http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing and let me know
> >>>what does.
> >>>
> >>>On 7/17/07, Ken Meltz <KenMeltz@-----.org> wrote:
> >>>>I'd be honored to be included in the article and, by all means, you have my
> >>>>permission.
