Talk:Atul Chitnis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Articles for deletion
This page was previously nominated for deletion. Please see prior discussion(s) before considering re-nomination:
Wikipedian An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Atul Chitnis, has edited Wikipedia as
Achitnis (talk · contribs)


[edit] Nominated for deletion

The article has been nominated for deletion and the discussion can be viewed here.

The deletion discussion (2nd nomination) has been moved from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis (second nomination) to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis (2nd nomination) as a house keeping act. The redirect from second nomination to 2nd nomination has been tagged for deletion. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 11:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

  • The result of this nomination was Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.143.10 (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edi dispute

I have protected this article because of the edit dispute surrounding it. Please work out all differences on this talk page. And while I am not supporting any particular edit or version of the article, I would like to hear Zamkudi's reasons for repeatedly deleting the vast majority of this article. While WP:BLP does permit the immediate removal of unsourced negative info, unsourced neutral or positive material is generally not removed in bulk from an article (and not all of the removed info was unsourced). I should add, though, that Zamkudi does not appear to have gutted the article prior to the AfD (as another user claimed on AN) and likewise, all sides in this edit dispute appear to be operating in good faith. So let's keep everything civil.--Alabamaboy 12:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)