Talk:Atom Heart Mother (suite)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Parts
"The only main argument about the song is about how long each part is" ... Ok, but shouldn't other views on the timing be aknowledged ? I for one think that the Funky Dung part is *... well, the part with a funky rythm, called Mother Fore here. Xave 16:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
I had originally added the timings and did so according to the descriptions (see edit by 69.194.91.148). I did not take much time in finding the movements for myself and put in rough timings, so you may be right on that. I couldn't belive it when Aja-Oki took 7 consecutive edits to break timings down to centiseconds. I laughed for a good 7.68 seconds. --Cerpin Taxt 23:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Hmmmm, interesting new timings. Somebody else out there is obviously very bored as well. I agree with Xave above that "Funky Dung" is surely the bit with the "funky" rhythm and bass line. Working backwards from that, I figured that the previous section with the choir must be "Mother Fore". Continuing backwards, I'd say "Breast Milky" is the cello solo, as that is a 2nd theme, and "Father's Shout" is the first theme (the brass band tune).--MackORell 10:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Ok, that makes one "you may be right" and on "you're right". Does someone sees a problem if we switch the "main" and the alternate "timing" ? (with proper rewriting, of course.) Xave 16:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
No, I think that'd be OK, unless anybody else has got any better suggestions for where each section starts.--MackORell 05:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Ok, More than two years after , I finally found the time to do it. :) xave (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Who talks ?
A citation on the question of who (Ron Geesin, Alan Parsons, or Peter Bown) says the two bits of studio chatter would be valuable. This article seems to be the only web page that suggests a person, and a usenet search turns up only a controversy over whether it is Parsons or Geesin.
[edit] "It is also the only Pink Floyd song over 18 minutes long without lyrics."
The article says "It is also the only Pink Floyd song over 18 minutes long without lyrics.". Which is the one that is 18 minutes, and also is without lyrics? If there isn't one, why was 18 minutes chosen?
Well, the next longest instrumental they have is A Saucerful of Secrets, no? That one's 12 minutes. IceKeyHunter 07:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- I modified it with a more convenient time: 15 minutes --200.118.217.125 23:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alan Parsons - Nick Mason
The spoken line - "silence in the studio!" i always thought was a nick mason line rather than alan parsons. Im not sure whether pink floyd had even met alan parsons at this time.
- This was the first of two Pink Floyd albums in which Parsons was an engineer (the other being The Dark Side of the Moon). For more discussion on who spoke that bit and the "Here is a loud announcement" bit, see above. --69.79.198.71 23:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia
"The song was the last Pink Floyd composition which was credited as being co-written by someone outside the band until "The Trial" of The Wall, which Bob Ezrin cowrote with Waters."
This doesn't really tell us a lot nor is it that significant. Just like you wouldn't say "This is the last song Pink Floyd wrote before 'One of These Days' on their next album", for example. SJH 22:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is significant, showing that Pink Floyd wrote all of their songs untill 1979. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 14:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mother Fore "lyrics"
Something interesting I came across: what appears to be the original score autographed by Ron Geesin.
Heres's what I can make from it:
Fah
See co ba
Neee toe
Ka reelo yea
Sa sa sa sa sa
Fss Drrrr boki
Rapateeka dodo tah
Rapateeka dodo cha
Ko sa fa mee ya
Na pa jee te' fia
Na pa ru be' m
Ba sa coo ba sa coo
Ba sa coo Ba sa cooooooo
Ku ku loo ku loo
Yea yea yea hm
Hm ku ku loo
You too boo coo coo joo
Foo goo hoo joo
Loo moo poo roo
Ooooooo
80.203.49.238 10:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:AtomHeartMotherCover.jpeg
The image Image:AtomHeartMotherCover.jpeg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)