Atomic line filter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A potassium Faraday filter designed, built and photographed by Jonas Hedin for making daytime LIDAR measurements at Arecibo Observatory.
A potassium Faraday filter designed, built and photographed by Jonas Hedin for making daytime LIDAR measurements at Arecibo Observatory.[1]

An atomic line filter (ALF) is an advanced optical band-pass filter used in the physical sciences for filtering electromagnetic radiation with precision, accuracy, and minimal signal strength loss. Atomic line filters work via the absorption or resonance lines of atomic vapors and so may also be designated an atomic resonance filter (ARF).[2]

The three major types of atomic line filters are absorption-re-emission ALFs, Faraday filters and Voigt filters.[3] Absorption-re-emission filters were the first type developed, and so are commonly called simply “atomic line filters”; the other two types are usually referred to specifically as “Faraday filters” or “Voigt filters”. Atomic line filters use different mechanisms and designs for different applications, but the same basic strategy is always employed: by taking advantage of the narrow lines of absorption or resonance in a metallic vapor, a specific frequency of light bypasses a series of filters that block all other light.[4]

Atomic line filters can be considered the optical equivalent of lock-in amplifiers; they are used in scientific applications requiring the effective detection of a narrowband signal (almost always laser light) that would otherwise be obscured by broadband sources, such as daylight.[3] They are used regularly in Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and are being studied for their potential use in laser communication systems.[5] Atomic line filters are superior to conventional dielectric optical filters such as interference filters and Lyot filters, but their greater complexity makes them practical only in background-limited detection, where a weak signal is detected while suppressing a strong background.[6] Compared to etalons, another high-end optical filter, Faraday filters are significantly sturdier and may be six times cheaper at around US$15,000 per unit.[7][8]

Contents

[edit] History

The predecessor of the atomic line filter was the infrared quantum counter, designed in the 1950s by Nicolaas Bloembergen. This was a quantum mechanical amplifier theorized by Joseph Weber to detect infrared radiation with very little noise.[9][10] Zero spontaneous emission was already possible for x-ray and gamma ray amplifiers and Weber thought to bring this technology to the infrared spectrum. Bloembergen described such a device in detail and dubbed it the “infrared quantum counter”.[11]

The media of these devices were crystals with transition metal ion impurities, absorbing low-energy light and re-emitting it in the visible range.[11] By the 1970s, atomic vapors were used in atomic vapor quantum counters for detection of infrared electromagnetic radiation, as they were found to be superior to the metallic salts and crystals that had been used.[12]

The principles hitherto employed in infrared amplification were put together into a passive sodium ALF.[13] This design and those that immediately followed it were primitive and suffered from low quantum efficiency and slow response time. As this was the original design for ALFs, many references use only the designation “atomic line filter” to describe specifically the absorption-re-emission construction. In 1977, Gelbwachs, Klein and Wessel created the first active atomic line filter.[2]

Faraday filters, developed sometime before 1978, were “a substantial improvement” over absorption-re-emission atomic line filters of the time.[3] The Voigt filter, patented by James H. Menders and Eric J. Korevaar on August 26, 1992,[14] was more advanced. Voigt filters were more compact and “[could] be easily designed for use with a permanent magnet”.[3] By 1996, Faraday filters were being used for LIDAR.[3]

[edit] Properties

A technical definition of an atomic line filter is as an “ultra-narrow-band, large-acceptance-angle, isotropic optical filter”.[2] “Ultra-narrow-band” defines the thin range of frequencies that an ALF may accept; an ALF generally has a passband on the order of 0.001 nanometer. That atomic line filters also have wide acceptance angles (near 180°) is another important characteristic of the devices; conventional dielectric filters based on the spacing of reflective or refractive layers change their effective spacing when light enters at an angle.

The exact parameters (temperature, magnetic field strength, length, etc.) of any filter may be tuned to a specific application. These values are calculated by computers due to the extreme complexity of the systems.[15]

[edit] Input/output

Atomic line filters may operate in the ultraviolet, visible and infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.[2] In absorption-re-emission ALFs, the frequency of light must be shifted in order for the filter to operate, and in a passive device, this shift must be to a lower frequency (i.e. red shifted) simply because of energy conservation. This means that passive filters are rarely able to work with infrared light, because the output frequency would be impractically low. If photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are used then the “output wavelength of the ARF should lie in a spectral region in which commercial, large-area, long-lived PMT’s [sic] possess maximum sensitivity”.[13] In such a case, active ALFs would have the advantage over passive ALFs as they would more readily, “generate output wavelengths in the near UV, the spectral region in which well-developed photocathodes possess their highest sensitivity”.[16]

In a passive ALF, the input frequency must correspond almost exactly to the natural absorption lines of the vapor cell. Active ARFs are much more flexible, however, as the vapor may be stimulated so that it will absorb other frequencies of light.[17][18]

Faraday and Voigt filters do not shift the frequency or wavelength of the signal light.

[edit] Response time and transmission rate

The response time of an absorption-re-emission atomic line filter directly affects the rate information is transmitted from the light source to the receiver. Therefore, a minimal response time is an important property of these ALFs. The response time of such an ALF, is largely dependent on the spontaneous decay of the excited atoms in the vapor cell. In 1988, Jerry Gelbwachs cited, “typical rapid spontaneous emission times are ~ 30 ns, which suggests that the upper limit on the information rate is approximately 30 MHz”.[16]

Many methods of decreasing the response time of ALFs have been developed. Even in the late 1980s, certain gases were used to catalyze the decay of the electrons of the vapor cell. In 1989, Eric Korevaar had developed his Fast ALF design which detected emitted fluorescence without photosensitive plates.[3] With such methods employed, gigahertz frequencies are easily attainable.[16]

[edit] Effectiveness

[edit] Efficiency

A graph of transmission to relative wavelength in a potassium FADOF centered at the D1 transition of 770.1093 nm. The graph is for a single polarization, so the maximum transmission is 0.5. The highlighted area is generally used as the transmission spectrum of the FADOF. No optical losses are shown.
A graph of transmission to relative wavelength in a potassium FADOF centered at the D1 transition of 770.1093 nm. The graph is for a single polarization, so the maximum transmission is 0.5. The highlighted area is generally used as the transmission spectrum of the FADOF. No optical losses are shown.

Atomic line filters are inherently very efficient filters, generally classified as “ultra-high-Q” as their Q factor is in the 105 to 106 range.[2] The passband of a typical Faraday filter may be a few GHz.[17] The total output of a Faraday filter may be around 50% of the total input light intensity. The light lost is reflected or absorbed by imperfect lenses, filters and windows.[19]

[edit] Band-pass

The band-pass of an atomic line filter is usually equal to the Doppler profile of the vapor cell, the natural range of frequencies at which a vapor cell will be excited by a pure light source. The Doppler profile is the width of the spectrum of Doppler shifted radiation emitted by the vapor cell due to its thermal motion. This value is less for larger atoms at lower temperatures, a system considered more ideal.

There are some circumstances where this is not the case, and it is desirable to make the width of the transition line larger than the Doppler profile. For instance, when tracking a quickly accelerating object, the band-pass of the ALF must include within it the maximum and minimum values for the reflected light. The accepted method for increasing the band-pass involves placing an inert gas in the vapor cell. This gas both widens the spectral line and increases the transmission rate of the filter.[6]

[edit] Sources of noise

For all of their efficiency, atomic line filters are not perfect; there are many sources of error, or “noise”, in a given system. These are manifest as electromagnetic radiation independent of the working processes of the filter and the intensity of the signal light. One source of error is the thermal radiation of and within the ALF itself. Some thermal radiation comes directly from the filter and happens to be within the bandpass of the second broad band filter. More noise is created if the filter is designed for output in the infrared range, as most of the thermal radiation would be in that spectrum. These emissions may stimulate the vapor and create the radiation it is trying to detect in the first place.[16]

Active atomic line filters are more likely to produce noise than passive ones because actives have no “state selectivity”; the pumping source may accidentally excite atoms hit by the wrong light up to the critical energy level, emitting radiation spontaneously.[6]

Other errors may be caused by atomic absorption/resonance lines not targeted but still active. Though most “near” transitions are over 10 nanometers away (far enough to be blocked by the broad-band filters), the fine and hyperfine structure of the target absorption line may absorb incorrect frequencies of light and pass them through to the output sensor.[6]

[edit] Relevant phenomena

Stark splitting in Hydrogen. Energy eigenvalues of Stark shifts are shown here as a function of electric field strength.
Stark splitting in Hydrogen. Energy eigenvalues of Stark shifts are shown here as a function of electric field strength.

Radiation trapping in an atomic line filter may seriously affect the performance and therefore tuning of an ALF. In the original studies of atomic line filters in the 1970s and early 1980s, there was a “large overestimation of the [signal bandwidth]”. Later, radiation trapping was studied, analyzed and ALFs were optimized to account for it.[20]

In all atomic line filters, the position and widths of the vapor cell resonance lines are among the most important properties. By the Stark effect and Zeeman splitting, the base absorption lines may be split into finer lines. “Stark and Zeeman tuning… can be used to tune the detector.”[12] Consequently, manipulation of electric and magnetic fields may alter other properties of the filter (i.e. shifting the passband).[21]

[edit] Types

This vector graphic depicts an abstraction of the methodology of an absorption re-emission ALF: how only a narrowband may bypass two broadband filters and create a very precise and accurate filter. Here, a careful manipulation of the frequency of incoming light may be translated into a spacial translation. A similar strategy is employed in both Faraday and Voigt filters, though in these filters, the polarization of the light is shifted and not the frequency.
This vector graphic depicts an abstraction of the methodology of an absorption re-emission ALF: how only a narrowband may bypass two broadband filters and create a very precise and accurate filter. Here, a careful manipulation of the frequency of incoming light may be translated into a spacial translation. A similar strategy is employed in both Faraday and Voigt filters, though in these filters, the polarization of the light is shifted and not the frequency.

[edit] Absorption-re-emission

An absorption-re-emission atomic line filter absorbs the desired wavelength of light and emits light that bypasses broadband filters. In passive absorption-re-emission ALFs, a high-pass filter blocks all low-energy incoming light. The vapor cell absorbs the signal, which coincides with the vapor’s thin absorption line, and the cell’s atoms become excited. The vapor cell then re-emits the signal light by undergoing fluorescence at a lower frequency. A low-pass filter blocks radiation above the frequency of the fluorescent light. In an active ALF, optical or electrical pumping is used for exciting these atoms so they absorb or emit light of different wavelengths. For active ALFs, other systems of conventional filters may be needed.[22]

Polarization of light by a Faraday filter.
Polarization of light by a Faraday filter.

[edit] Faraday filter

A Faraday filter, magneto-optical filter, FADOF or EFADOF (Excited Faraday Dispersive Optical Filter) works by rotating the polarization of the light passing through the vapor cell. This rotation occurs near its atomic absorption lines by the Faraday effect and anomalous dispersion. Only light at the resonant frequency of the vapor is rotated and the polarized plates block other electromagnetic radiation.[23] This effect is related to and enhanced by the Zeeman Effect,[17] or the splitting of atomic absorption lines in the presence of the magnetic field.[24][25] Light at the resonant frequency of the vapor exits a FADOF near its original strength but with an orthogonal polarization.

Following the laws which govern the Faraday effect, the rotation of the targeted radiation is directly proportional to the strength of the magnetic field, the width of the vapor cell and the Verdet constant (which is dependent on the temperature of the cell, wavelength of the light and sometimes intensity of the field)[26] of the vapor in the cell. This relationship is represented the following equation:

\beta = \mathcal{V}Bd [27]

[edit] Voigt filter

A Voigt filter is a Faraday filter with its magnetic field shifted to be perpendicular to the direction of the light and at 45° to the polarization of the polarized plates.[28] In a Voigt filter, the vapor cell acts as a half wave plate, retarding one polarization by 180° per the Voigt effect.[29]

[edit] Common components

A diagram of the parts of a Faraday filter. In a Voigt filter, the magnetic field would be rotated 90 degrees. Note that the two polarizer plates are perpendicular in direction of polarization.
A diagram of the parts of a Faraday filter. In a Voigt filter, the magnetic field would be rotated 90 degrees. Note that the two polarizer plates are perpendicular in direction of polarization.

Preceding an atomic line filter may be a collimator, which straightens incident light rays for passing through the rest of the filter consistently; however, collimated light is not always necessary.[30][8] After the collimator, a high-pass filter blocks almost half of the incoming light (that of too long a wavelength). In Faraday and Voigt filters, the first polarizing plate is used here to block light.

The next component in an atomic line filter is the vapor cell; this is common to all atomic line filters. It either absorbs and re-emits the incident light, or rotates its polarization by the Faraday or Voigt effect. Following the vapor cell is a low-pass filter, designed to block all of the light that the first filter did not, except the designated frequency of light which came from the fluorescence. In Faraday and Voigt filters, a second polarizing plate is used here.

Other systems may be used in conjunction with the rest of an atomic line filter for practicality. For instance, the polarizers used in the actual Faraday filter don’t block most radiation, “because these polarizers only work over a limited wavelength region … a broad band interference filter is used in conjunction with the Faraday filter”.[29] The passband of the interference filter may be 200 times that of the actual filter.[19] Photomultiplier tubes, too, are often used for increasing the intensity of the output signal to a usable level. Avalanche photomultipliers, which are more efficient, may be used instead of a PMT.[2][8]

[edit] Vapor cell

While every implementation of each kind of ALF is different, the vapor cell in each is relatively similar. The thermodynamic properties of vapor cells in filters are carefully controlled because they determine important qualities of the filter, for instance the necessary strength of the magnetic field.[31] Light is let into and out of this vapor chamber by way of two low-reflection windows made of a material such as magnesium fluoride. The other sides of the cell may be of any opaque material, though generally a heat-resistant metal or ceramic is used as the vapor is usually kept at temperatures upwards of 100 °C.

Most ALF vapor cells use alkali metals because of their high vapor pressures; many alkali metals also have absorption lines and resonance in the desired spectra.[28] Common vapor cell materials are sodium, potassium and caesium. Note that non-metallic vapors such as neon may be used.[32][18] As the early quantum counters used solid state metal ions in crystals, it is conceivable that such a medium could be used in the ALFs of today. This is presumably not done because of the superiority of atomic vapors in this capacity.[12]

[edit] Applications

“ [Atomic line filters] are ideally suited for applications in which weak laser signals are detected against a continuum background[2] ”

Atomic line filters are most often used in LIDAR and other exercises in laser tracking and detection, for their ability to filter daylight and effectively discern weak, narrowband signals; however, they may be used for filtering out the earth’s thermal background,[33] measuring the efficiencies of antibiotics[34] and general filtering applications.

Drawing of the receiver end of a laser tracking system from US patent 5202741
Drawing of the receiver end of a laser tracking system from US patent 5202741

[edit] Laser tracking and communication

Without an atomic line filter, laser tracking and communication may be difficult. Usually, intensified charge-coupled device cameras must be used in conjunction with simple dielectric optical filters (e.g. interference filters) to detect laser emissions at a distance. Intensified CCDs are inefficient and necessitate the use of a pulsed laser transmission within the visible spectrum. With the superior filtering system of an ALF, a non-intensified CCD may be used with a continuous wave laser more efficiently. “[Atomic line filters] with passbands of about 0.001 nm have been developed to improve the background rejection of conventionally filtered laser receivers”.[3] The total energy consumption of the latter system is “30 to 35 times less” than that of the former,[35] so space-based, underwater and agile laser communications with ALFs have been proposed and developed.[2][28]

Starfire Optical Range LIDAR laser.
Starfire Optical Range LIDAR laser.

[edit] LIDAR

LIDAR comprises firing lasers at relevant portions of the atmosphere where light is backscattered. By analyzing the reflected laser beam for Doppler shifts, wind speeds and wind directions in the target region may be calculated. The thermal structure, diurnal/semi-diurnal tides, and seasonal variations in the mesopause region may thus be studied. This is a valuable faculty for meteorologists and climatologists, as these properties can be significant.[5]

However, without the ability to effectively track weak laser signals, collection of atmospheric data would be relegated to times of day where the sun's electromagnetic emissions did not drown out the laser's signal. The addition of an atomic line filter to the LIDAR equipment effectively filters interference to the laser's signal to the point where LIDAR data can be collected at any time of the day[5]. For the past decade, Faraday filters have been used to do this. Consequently, scientists know significantly more today about the Earth’s middle atmosphere than they did before the advent of the FADOF.[36][8]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Hedin 2002, p. 2
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1266
  3. ^ a b c d e f g US patent 5731585
  4. ^ Oehry, Schupita & Sumetsberger 1994
  5. ^ a b c Hedin 2002, p. 8
  6. ^ a b c d Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1270
  7. ^ US patent 5513032
  8. ^ a b c d Fricke-Begemann, Alpers & Höffner 2002
  9. ^ Weber 1957
  10. ^ Goodwin 1974
  11. ^ a b Bloembergen 1958, p. 84
  12. ^ a b c Gelbwachs, Klein & Wessel 1977, p. 77
  13. ^ a b Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1268
  14. ^ Webster’s Online Dictionary 2006
  15. ^ Hedin 2002, p. 26
  16. ^ a b c d Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1269
  17. ^ a b c Popescu & Walther 2005, p. 1
  18. ^ a b Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1267
  19. ^ a b Hedin 2002, p. 33
  20. ^ Molisch & Oehry 1998, p. 366
  21. ^ Gelbwachs, Klein & Wessel 1979, p. 137
  22. ^ Molisch & Oehry 1998, p. 361
  23. ^ Friedman 2005
  24. ^ Hedin 2002, p. 25
  25. ^ Fitzpatrick 2002
  26. ^ Bass 1995, p. 35.45
  27. ^ Hedin 2002, p. 16
  28. ^ a b c US patent 7058110
  29. ^ a b US patent 5710652
  30. ^ Hedin 2002, p. 24
  31. ^ Menders, Searcy & Ross 1993
  32. ^ Endo, Yabuzaki & Kitano 1978
  33. ^ Gelbwachs 1988, p. 1276
  34. ^ US patent 5573927
  35. ^ US patent 5202741, p. 4–8
  36. ^ Sherman 2005

[edit] Bibliography

  • Bass, Michael (1995), Handbook of optics, vol. II, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0070479747
  • Bloembergen, Nicolaas (1958), "Solid State Infrared Quantum Counters", Physical Review Letters 2 (3): 84–85.
  • Fricke-Begemann, Cord; Matthias Alpers & Josef Höffner (2002), "Daylight rejection with a new receiver for potassium resonance temperature lidars", Optics Letters (Optical Society of America) 27 (21): 1932–1934.
  • Gelbwachs, Jerry A.; Christopher F. Klein & John E. Wessel (1977), "Infrared Detection by an Atomic Vapor Quantum Counter", IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics (IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics Society) QE-14 (2): 77–79.
  • Gelbwachs, Jerry A.; Christopher F. Klein & John E. Wessel (1979), "Stark Tuning of the Atomic Vapor Quantum Counter", IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics (IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics Society) QE-16 (2): 137–142.
  • Gelbwachs, Jerry A. (1988), "Atomic Resonance Filters", IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics (IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics Society) QE-24 (7): 1266–1277, ISSN 0018-9197.
  • Goodwin, D. W. (1974), written at London and New York, Advances in Quantum Electronics, vol. 1, Academic Press.
  • Höffner, Josef & Cord Fricke-Begemann (2005), "Accurate lidar temperatures with narrowband filters", Optics Letters (Optical Society of America) 30 (8): 890–892.
  • Weber, Joseph (1957), "Maser Noise Considerations", Physical Review 108: 537.

[edit] Patents

[edit] Further reading

  • H. Chen, M. A. White, D. A. Krueger, and C. Y. She. Daytime mesopause temperature measurements with a sodium-vapor dispersive Faraday filter in a lidar receiver. Opt. Letters, 21(15):1093–1095, 1996.
  • H. Chen, C. Y. She, P. Searcy, and E. Korevaar. Sodium-vapor dispersive Faraday filter. Optics Letters, 18:1019–1021, June 1993.
Languages