Talk:ATN

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
ATN is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.

[edit] Edit 167391748 by IP 58.168.65.159

Three edits were made by IP 58.168.65.159 over 25 October to 27 October 2007. The last (167392099) and first edit (166949473) appear to be legitimate but the middle edit has, IMHO, questionable material.

For the edit 167391748, the user claims on line 42 that Home and Away is produced at Pyrmont yet the Home and Away page states that the series is currently produced at the Epping studios, Palm Beach and Collaroy.

The other bits of this edit also appear questionable. "Rival" [National Nine news] has been changed to "ex-big winner" and "Sydney" to "Melbourne" even though this page only talks about Channel Seven in Sydney.

Three times on the programming list, the user has added "Classic old". What would this mean?

It is my belief that this edit is vandalism, with the exception of "A year before the news and current affairs moved to Martin Place", which needs to be backed up with a reference.

Cula 14:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Fast forward and Full Frontal were Melbourne productions filmed in South Melbourne. Kath and Kim is a Melbourne production also. Are people stupid? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesbehave (talkcontribs) 17:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Fixed. Quaidy 04:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

WTF? Someone says that ACA was on Seven? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.193.120 (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ATN7 12m Sattelites.jpg

Image:ATN7 12m Sattelites.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)