Talk:Atlas Mountains
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hmm, I thought it was the High Atlas and the Anti Atlas Mountains...
Contents |
[edit] The other map
I think that two maps are too many for a small stub like this. --tyomitch 21:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Text removed from article—restoration with elaboration or explanation may make sense.
Removed this text: "The Atlas ancient. It also plays an important role in Greek mythology."
Is this saying the Atlas mountains are ancient? Is so, I'd suggest a more specific geologic comment.
Is this a suggestion that the origin of of the name Atlas mountains comes from Greek mythology? If so, please expalin how they link (perhaps Carthaginians?).
Thanks - Williamborg 00:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- See Atlas (mythology)#Variations. :NikoSilver: 15:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge proposal
I propose that the High Atlas article be merged into this article, Atlas Mountains, as all the information mentioned in High Atlas is mentioned here. Moreover, here is a section on the Moroccan Atlas (which includes the High Atlas), maybe the place to talk about different aspects of the High Atlas. --User:AAM | Talk 19:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Better to build the content of the High Atlas article than to arbitrarily merge it. Remember that the Wikipedia is built around a database structure—that is its strength—one can have multiple linked articles—and it should. Let's add material on the High Atlas! Williamborg 02:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- A quick look at the German site and the French site show you that there is a great deal of material to be added to the High Atlas.
- Keep Wikipedia Weird. Wikipedia is about adding useful material! Resist the efforts of the folks who would prune when they should be adding new material! Williamborg 01:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Articles in the entire Atlas Mountain cluster have been expanded. Williamborg 13:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'll try to find a time to translate the french wiki. -- Szvest 09:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Wow, there's been a lot of work since User:AAM proposed deletion. All the Atlas related articles are improved. This is a much better set of articles. If User:Williamborg didn't already have a Barnstar for geography, I'd nominate him for one. UmptanumRedux 14:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nice work. :NikoSilver: 15:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - the Atlas Mountains comprise several ranges, each of which deserves a separate page - MPF 10:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I am also impressed by the work that has been done since my proposal! Obviously the reasons I stated at that time have disappeared. Nice! --User:AAM | Talk 20:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- It does the heart of a devoted inclusionist good to see a merger recommendation go away. Thanks for the kind words; this is what keeps us obssesive, cumpulsive Wikipedians going, and going and going... Williamborg 03:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rif is not a part of the Atlas
It's a well known fact. Here's my sources [1] [2] . Note that the Rif is a range of mountains itself. [3] [4]. They're both different ranges. I'll update the map in this article. -- Sabertooth 21:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)