The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit ° history ° watch ° refresh)
I thought that Wikipedia articles were supposed to present objective facts, not editorial comment. This article is terrible. First, the html tags are totally fubar. Worst is that the content is nearly all opinion from an author who is evidently bitter, and/or has some personal ax to grind. I have encountered more objective comments on sports talk radio shows. The article is in my opinion so flawed that the cleanest remedy would be to delete it and start over.