Talk:AT&T Building (Nashville)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
AT&T Building (Nashville) is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Watch Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Template Usage] |
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the Project's importance scale. | |
 |
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] ummmmm
when was it built? 06:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rename to AT&T Building
source of reason: http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=22140 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaming Freek (talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rewrite of the article
Okay, so I've gone through and completely rewritten the article and provided lots of sources. Some possibly controversial stuff that needs to be cleared: most sources point to the building being 31-stories and 617 feet. 33-story figures are primarily seen on Wikipedia derivatives and similar sites, but also on credible ones. I've also seen 630 and 660 ft figures, though not widespread (mostly in Nashville City Paper articles). There is also a question of exact total interior square footage as I found one hopefully reliable website (Ray Bell Construction) which gave a figure of 1.3 million square feet, but I think what is there now works. I would like to see a significant fleshing-out of the Architecture section, however, I was unable to locate much in the way of source material for it. I look forward to seeing what others can add, but remember, any changes that are made must be backed up by a reliable source. -- Huntster T • @ • C 03:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
