Talk:Astrobotic Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Edit summary

I don't think that Andrevan's edit was harmful. Truly. That's why I assumed good faith.

However, I do think that I don't know why it was changed. That's what the edit summary is for. The edit can simply be redone and a short note on who, what, and why should be included. E_dog95 ^Hi 18:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I didn't leave one because it was obvious what I was doing, and no further exposition seemed necessary.Andre (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

For the sake of clarification: This edit was made due to the article being corrected to agree with the reference. Andre (talk) 19:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

It took you more than an hour to finally say what you're intentions were with that simple edit. During that hour, you accused me of vandalism, threatened me with blocking, and generally showed poor conduct when collaborating with others. I do not respect your ways, nor your ability as an editor on this collaboration-based encyclopedia. We should not have to research the who's and what's of your edits simply because you weren't nice enough to leave a summary. E_dog95 ^Hi 20:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)