Talk:Asteroid hyalosis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the WikiProject Ophthalmology, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to ophthalmology on Wikipedia. To participate, visit the project page. |
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Veterinary medicine.
This project provides a central approach to Veterinary medicine-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit comments - comment history - watch comments ยท refresh this page) Needs expansion. --Joelmills 01:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
[edit] Photo is wrong?
The dog photo appears to show a lens opacity (cataract) rather than vitreous pathology (asteroid hyalosis).
- The dog in the photo has both nuclear sclerosis and asteroid hyalosis. I know it's a lousy photo, but it's all I could get with my limited photographic abilities. If you think it's not a good representation of the condition, we can definitely remove it. --Joelmills 04:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I put up what I hope is a better image. One of these days I'll get the focus right. --Joelmills 05:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Third attempt is up. Any thoughts? -Joelmills 03:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Looks good to me! However, for those who don't understand what they're looking at, perhaps a diagram (showing the asteroids behind the lens, in the vitreous cavity) would be more instructive :) PedEye1 03:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. I don't suppose there is a eye cross section diagram already in existence (and with a free license) with which we can work? -Joelmills 15:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
