User talk:Aspects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Archive 1 - August 2007 thru May 2008

Contents

[edit] Flags in Television Infoboxes

Heads-up - I've replied to your post over at the television infobox talk page :). TalkIslander 16:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sissel

hello!

thanks for putting that album cover of Sissel back into the article. :-)

but beware, it will likely be removed again by that wacko Norwegian mod. I don't understand his reasoning, and he is on a wikibreak, not answering anything. he just took off every single image on that page, citing "significance" as the lacking factor. I don't understand that at all.

Significance is such a personal thing; what one person deems as significant doesn't necessarily have to be significant to another person. I say that as long as the image has fair use and a good license, there shouldn't be any grounds to remove it.

cheers! OettingerCroat (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gackt image

Hello!


I don't know if you've actually read the summary for the image you removed on that article, but as per the rules of wikipedia regarding the use of album covers, the image fully complies with the guidelines.

Just letting you know!

Thanks!

(Tsukiakari (talk) 06:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Image tagging

Hi, I noticed you recetly tagged Image:Pain For Pleasure.png as orphaned, when it was only orphaned when you removed it from the article first. It would be fairer to the uploader to state your real reason for disputing the fair use rationale on the image page. Cheers Kevin (talk) 02:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Melinda's Backups

Why do you keep removing the link to Melinda's Backups from the Melinda_Doolittle page? We are a pretty significant section of her fans as this page (http://www.melindasbackups.com/static/marathon.htm) demonstrates . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akc42 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] License tags

I was using "add" as a quick short hand that the tags were compliant. You stated they should not be used because "The logo is being used in the band's article without any critical commentary like the licensing tag states" however, if you review Wikipedia:Logos and the tag, you'll see that "identification", which is the case for these logos, is a permitted use. MBisanz talk 04:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)