From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello Aspandyar Agha! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button  located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Behnam 17:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
Getting Started
|
|
|
|
Getting your info out there
|
|
|
|
Getting more Wikipedia rules
|
|
|
|
|
Getting Help
|
|
|
|
Getting along
|
|
|
|
Getting technical
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] Dorood dost e gerami
Sure, if you need help with English or getting around Wikipedia just ask me or anyone else. Eid mubarak to you and your family too. Sallam berasa. -- Behnam 17:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hotaki
Thank you for your comment on the Hotaki dynasty. Usually, comments on placed on the User's talk page rather than on their User page. I have moved the information that you provided to the Hotaki talk page. --Bejnar 03:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kart Maliks
Hi, the problem is that it is the first time I heard this name! Could you please give a good online reference? Thanks. --Pejman47 21:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I have started a review of my block at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Another_block_review if you wish to add your representations there. Please note that ethnic and nationalistic considerations formed no part of my actions, and appeals on that basis is unlikely to succeed. If Beh-nam has previously edited in accordance with WP policies and guidelines, then these are the subjects to concentrate upon. LessHeard vanU 17:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I made the 4th RV because user:DWC LR made his 3rd revert without any explanation. Making reverts without an explanation is as good as vandalism. I provided my explanation and it was sound and made perfect sense while he provided no reasoning. I understand it is still edit warring, but it is him edit warring not really me. If I get blocked for the 4th revert then he should also be blocked for initiating baseless edit warring or atleast he should have gotten a warning. Please review the history page here and you can see that he was reverting without any reasons while I was providing unquestionable reasoning. He is a self proclaimed monarchis and was reverting based on his POV, not on any reasoning and with no edit summary. It is not fair to give me a block and nothing to him. --Behnam 20:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Your excuse for violating WP:3RR appears to be that someone else was reverting your changes. This is the very thing that 3RR is set up to stop. The block is valid and I find no reason to lift it. — Yamla 20:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Also another reason why I accidentally violated this rule is because on my 3rd revert I was not logged in so I did not see that I was making my 4th revert. Can you consider this please? -- Behnam 20:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "No. It is forbidden to make more than three reverts whether or not you know that you are doing it. It's your job to keep track of your reverts. — Sandstein 20:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
