Talk:AsiaSoft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
VG To-do: edit  Peer review: Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games, Crash of the Titans, Xbox Live Arcade, Myst III: Exile Cleanup: List of characters from The King of Fighters, Hellgate: London, LeChuck Featured article candidates: Crackdown, Halo (series), List of Sega 32X games, Alleyway Good article nominations: Ayu Tsukimiya, Music of the Final Fantasy Tactics series, Super Smash Bros., Music of Final Fantasy XI Article status review: GA Review – None; FA Review – The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, 3D Monster Maze; FT Review – None Articles for Deletion: Participate in video game related deletion discussions. Images: Add box-art and screenshots to articles. Make sure to include a valid non-free use rationale. Monitor the following related changes pages: changes to WP:VG and changes to this to-do list. Announce your new articles Sign up for the new VG Newsletter.

[edit] Inaccuracies in criticisms

Hi all, you might like to note that there have been factual inaccuracies in the Asiasoft article that require citations to back up the claims. There are many normative, biased statements in the criticisms section that may or may not be true, but certainly without citations this article appears to lack neutrality.

Low Quality Games - Strange claim for a Wikipedia article, and strongly suggests bias (especially without citation).
Inefficient customer service - Again, another strange claim, and without citation strongly suggests bias. Also, a claim based on opinion - "inefficiency" is subjective. And subjectivity means disputed neutrality.

We'll leave it to the users to decide.
165.21.154.117 (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting

I'm reverting AuroraStars' version since it's definitely more informative. Maple punch, if you wanna keep the criticism category why not just append it instead of reverting it? Quite obvious that AuroraStars spent quite a bit of time on researching and enhancing this article (compare the version and you'll know) Maple punch's version contains fake external links and some false information about the company Ashtart 05:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)