Talk:Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A mortarboard This article is part of WikiProject Universities, an attempt to standardise coverage of universities and colleges. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Christianity
Christianity Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Church of the Nazarene. (rated as High importance)
Assessment comments

[edit] Contact info removal

(from Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory) This in an official policy. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Wikipedia articles are not:

  1. Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station generally should not list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules may be acceptable. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages . Aepoutre 15:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC) User:Aepoutre 11:30 June 20, 2007 (EST)

[edit] Review of this Article

Please review this article as I have recently: 1. Updated references for the article 2. Edited for style

Please indicate areas that are "directory"-like, so that the quality can be improved and rating updated.

Thanks

Steve

Smjwalsh 17:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. History, faculty and staff, and external links are all too long, undoubtedly contain unwanted or irrelevant information, are perhaps redundant, and mean nothing without a real reflist. Regardless of citation or length, there is nothing encyclopedic about a list of faculty and staff. Thanks for all your contributions, Steve. One thing I'd certainly recommend is not to just add weblinks, but to use the ref tags, and name those links within the ref tag. I can help you with all of this if you don't know how to make references, a reflist, etc. While I haven't read all of it, be careful that editing for style means encyclopedic and NPOV wording, not editorial statements. I would've done much of this myself (I tend to edit and Wikify a lot of Nazarene articles myself), but the sheer insanity of its current nature rather overwhelms me. Thanks so much for doing this! Aepoutre 15:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)