Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Tunnel Rats
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Closing administrator's rationale
If you choose to add follow-on comments to this page, please do so in a new section below it. Do not interrupt my comments here.
[edit] Raw !vote count analysis
- Delete
- Seicer (4 edits) <nominator>
- Nick Dowling (3 edits)
- Gatoclass (2 edits)
- Jpp42 (2 edits)
- Keep
- Jachin
- Sf46
- Merge
- Shoessss (3 edits)
- Non-specific or invalidated
- Sting au (2 edits) (added delsort, then made an ambiguous comment)
- Grey Wanderer <-- stated "Keep per JPP42", but that user said delete
- Non-participatory
- 137.111.63.115 (vandalism)
- Antonio Lopez (reverted vandalism)
- Yamamoto Ichiro (relisted)
[edit] Argument evaluation
- Valid delete arguments
- Does not pass WP:N
- Only web search results are own web-site and forums
- No sources provided
- Tagged as unreferenced since March 2007
- Non-notable private club
- Non-valid delete arguments
- Appears to be defunct
- Notability does not expire
- Valid keep arguments
none
- Non-valid keep arguments
- Made front page news in Australia on numerous occasions
- No evidence in provided sources
- Currently in process of... this will be more front page stuff
- Australia's largest urban exploration group
- Over 2,000 members
- seems to be somewhat notable
- Non-valid Merge argument
- Merge with Cave Clan (per provided sources)
- Nothing in the sources has anything to do with the subject of this article by name
[edit] Additional sources provided in discussion
- [1]
- A user said: does not look like comprehensive coverage
- [2]
- A user said: does not look like comprehensive coverage
- Sydney Morning Herald article on urban explorers does not mention this group:
[edit] Summary
The keeps were very weak. The merge proposal was invalid. The deletes had valid reasons based in policy, guideline, and precedent. My decision is Delete. JERRY talk contribs 04:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)