Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Project Chanology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Comment on cyberterrorism - I sometimes get a raised eyebrow when I accuse POV-pushers of using this project to promote cyberterrorism to forward their POV. Let's just take a look at who we are elevating to a level where their attacks and announcements are worthy of encyclopedic coverage even before they prove to be anything. See the first hit on this search (I will not link directly to a copyright violation but this is worth seeing). --JustaHulk (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Response: -- I have not seen the word "cyberterrorism" used to describe this group, or this event, website, or anything associated with it in any of my research so far by any WP:RS/WP:V news organization, blog, or anything of the sort. In fact, the first and only time that I have seen this term used in this manner, is by JustaHulk (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 22:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Really, I invented that term??? Cool. Oh wait, here it is:
Does that sound like anything that Anonymous might be involved with. Watch the Fox11 video if you have any doubts. --JustaHulk (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)"Cyber-terrorism is the leveraging of a target's computers and information technology, particularly via the Internet, to cause physical, real-world harm or severe disruption of infrastructure."
- Really? Did I say you "invented" the term? No. That's not what I said. I said no one but you has ever used that term so far in the media/news/press/blogs to refer to Project Chanology or anything associated with these events. Perhaps it is you that are trying to use Wikipedia to push out a new association of this term with this group? This has zero relevance to whether or not this subject of this article passes WP:NOTE, and is bordering on disruption of this AfD. Cirt (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Oh, sorry. I guess I misinterpreted this line: "In fact, the first and only time that I have seen this term used in this manner." The point in that there is a term for what they do and that term is "cyber-terrorism". Death threats, bomb threats (watch the video) there is no reason to whitewash this group. Watch the Fox11 video. This is totally relevant to whether this article has a place in this project. --JustaHulk (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This AfD discussion page is NOT a forum or a message board for anyone to promote their own POV or push out their own version of terminology associated with the subject of this article. Discussion should be related to why or why not this article passes WP:NOTE. Take any forum type discussion to a personal blog, but not Wikipedia pages, as per policy. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note to closing Admin: Please note that I have advised the user JustaHulk (talk · contribs) that this continued posting that is off-topic to determining WP:NOTE is disruptive and in violation of WP:NOT#FORUM, yet the user continues to be disruptive and continue said actions. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Really? Did I say you "invented" the term? No. That's not what I said. I said no one but you has ever used that term so far in the media/news/press/blogs to refer to Project Chanology or anything associated with these events. Perhaps it is you that are trying to use Wikipedia to push out a new association of this term with this group? This has zero relevance to whether or not this subject of this article passes WP:NOTE, and is bordering on disruption of this AfD. Cirt (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Really, I invented that term??? Cool. Oh wait, here it is:
- Response: -- I have not seen the word "cyberterrorism" used to describe this group, or this event, website, or anything associated with it in any of my research so far by any WP:RS/WP:V news organization, blog, or anything of the sort. In fact, the first and only time that I have seen this term used in this manner, is by JustaHulk (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 22:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Note to admin re spas
Sorry, but the comments are coming in so fast, it's too much work to parse which are which. We have had WP:SPAs voice comments on both the delete and keep sides of the aisle - I'll leave it to the Closing Admin to figure it all out. Cirt (talk) 05:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
