Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nellie Pratt Russell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Surprise, surprise....if Miranda doesn't like someone making a change, then it must be disruptive. The notability of an article or the worth it has to the encyclopedia is not directly correlated to the work that someone put into it. If the articles are worth keeping, then the vote will go that way. If they are not, then they will be deleted. Either way, you do not own these articles. Please be civil, and continue to contribute. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- And, that's why I am leaving, because of POV pushers like you who don't write articles and like to disrupt. Miranda 19:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- How exactly am I being a POV pusher? Because I used the process afforded to me to have an article evaluated as to whether or not it belongs in Wikipedia? Justinm1978 (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, you POV push on articles that people are working on, the whole Title XI "Not a Service Sorority/Fraternity" thing, you haven't added to the encyclopedia, but to distrupt. I want Alpha Kappa Alpha to be a FA, and have created the articles on each of the founders, but you decided to delete all of them, because they are not all notable? THEY ARE FOUNDERS OF AN ORGANIZATION, OF COURSE THEY ARE NOTABLE? Let's see, how about I AFD all of the Eagle Scout founders, and we will call it even. My respect for you is in the negative right now, because your recent edits to me are disruptive. Miranda 19:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome to use the means provided to you in order to advance the encyclopedia, and I won't stop you. You have just as much of a right as me to list things for deletion if you do not believe they are notable, and I encourage you to do so if you feel that way. But wouldn't that be disruptive to prove a point? Just because they were created doesn't mean they belong. We'll see what the community has to say, and I'll be happy to abide by that. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, you POV push on articles that people are working on, the whole Title XI "Not a Service Sorority/Fraternity" thing, you haven't added to the encyclopedia, but to distrupt. I want Alpha Kappa Alpha to be a FA, and have created the articles on each of the founders, but you decided to delete all of them, because they are not all notable? THEY ARE FOUNDERS OF AN ORGANIZATION, OF COURSE THEY ARE NOTABLE? Let's see, how about I AFD all of the Eagle Scout founders, and we will call it even. My respect for you is in the negative right now, because your recent edits to me are disruptive. Miranda 19:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- How exactly am I being a POV pusher? Because I used the process afforded to me to have an article evaluated as to whether or not it belongs in Wikipedia? Justinm1978 (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- And, that's why I am leaving, because of POV pushers like you who don't write articles and like to disrupt. Miranda 19:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, I won't. Your pointy edits as well as disruption are just too much for me to contribute here anymore. You have also bitten a new user, HistoricDST. Hmm...what's next? An MFD of WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities? Because of your disruptions, I have decided to open up a project on Wikia, and the founders will be there for all of to see. I am a syops and bureaucrat on the wiki as well. If you decide to disrupt on there as you are doing here, you will be blocked without warning. I encourage all to contribute, since I see that one person is trying to control what and what is not on the encyclopedia, regarding fraternities and sororities. I thought Wikipedia was supposed to be an encyclopedia that anyone can edit or add to? Hmm...I guess they left out the POV pushers who don't do anything, except to disrupt. Miranda 20:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] comment
The way that this AfD was was started was a little annoying. As I look through these perhaps some of them are not notable, but many are. It would be better to bring this up on a case by case basis to suggest a merge for the specific bios that don't seem notable enough. futurebird (talk) 04:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
